git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: work around the tested repo having an index.lock
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:24:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACBZZX52O9Pf=5Xtq1Lg1=ZU26tm7pupvubk1ZjNJZp7kR450g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqd1amx80f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> But I think a more compelling case is that there may be an ongoing
>> operation in the original repo (e.g., say you are in the middle of
>> writing a commit message) when we do a blind copy of the filesystem
>> contents. You might racily pick up a lockfile.
>>
>> Should we find and delete all *.lock files in the copied directory? That
>> would get ref locks, etc. Half-formed object files are OK. Technically
>> if you want to get an uncorrupted repository you'd also want to copy
>> refs before objects (in case somebody makes a new object and updates a
>> ref while you're copying).
>>
>> I don't know how careful it's worth being. I don't really _object_ to
>> this patch exactly, but it does seem like it's picking up one random
>> case (that presumably you hit) and ignoring all of the related cases.
>
> My feeling exactly.  Diagnosing and failing upfront saying "well you
> made a copy but it is not suitable for testing" sounds more sensible
> at lesat to me.

This change makes the repo suitable for testing when it wasn't before.

Yes, there are cases where there are other issues than index.lock
preventing testing the repo, but I don't see why there shouldn't be a
partial solution that solves a very common case in lieu of a perfect
solution.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-03 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-02 10:33 [PATCH] perf: work around the tested repo having an index.lock Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-02 18:45 ` Jeff King
2017-06-02 20:12   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-02 23:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-03 16:24     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2017-06-04  0:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-04  0:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-04  7:37         ` Christian Couder
2017-06-04  7:55           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-04  8:23             ` Jeff King
2017-06-05  2:02           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-05  6:25             ` Christian Couder
2017-06-04  8:29         ` Jeff King
2017-06-05  2:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-04  2:04   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-04  8:37     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACBZZX52O9Pf=5Xtq1Lg1=ZU26tm7pupvubk1ZjNJZp7kR450g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).