git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Git enterprise setup on a large project
@ 2011-04-02 19:50 Frederic JECKER
  2011-04-03 18:31 ` Enrico Weigelt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frederic JECKER @ 2011-04-02 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

Hi,

I'm looking to replace my team's old and clumsy CVS server, as a GIT
user for personal projects I'm wondering what would be the best way to
achieve this using GIT. I've googled the subject a few times and read
books but I still have a handfull of questions

Our team is composed of 10 developers.
A common developer workspace takes about 1Go of space and contains
about 50 modules (up to 100 if the developer is working on satellite
applications/modules) - we're maintaining a large java-based
healthcare system.
Each module is a CVS project.
Our use of CVS is.. well..clumsy too (don't ask me why we do things
like this, those were decided about 10 years ago before I started
working in this company).
Features to be delivered in the next release are committed directly on the head.
The project leader cherry picks the commits on his local working copy
within a dedicated workspace.

I first thought of creating a single project in order to group the
100+ modules and to ease the creation of maintenance branches.
Each developer would clone the full workspace from a "blessed" repository.
The "blessed" repository would be managed by the project leader which
would simply pull changes from each developer pubic repository.
I tested this scenario but, as the workspace is really big, each
operation is really slow.

What could I do then ?
- Use submodules ?
- Create a blessed per-project repository and instead of a public
repository for each developer create a per-project public and shared
repository ?
...I'm a bit lost

Thanks for your help

Fred

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* re:Git enterprise setup on a large project
@ 2011-04-02 19:53 Frederic JECKER
  2011-04-02 22:45 ` Git " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frederic JECKER @ 2011-04-02 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

Sorry for posting here.. just found that there was also a git-users
mailing list.
Please ignore my post

All my apologies

Regards

Fred

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Git enterprise setup on a large project
  2011-04-02 19:53 re:Git enterprise setup on a large project Frederic JECKER
@ 2011-04-02 22:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2011-04-02 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frederic JECKER; +Cc: git@vger.kernel.org

On Saturday, April 2, 2011, Frederic JECKER <frederic.jecker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for posting here.. just found that there was also a git-users
> mailing list.
> Please ignore my post

This is the right place.

Git-users is something just something extra.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Git enterprise setup on a large project
  2011-04-02 19:50 Frederic JECKER
@ 2011-04-03 18:31 ` Enrico Weigelt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Weigelt @ 2011-04-03 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

* Frederic JECKER <frederic.jecker@gmail.com> wrote:

> What could I do then ?
> - Use submodules ?
> - Create a blessed per-project repository and instead of a public
> repository for each developer create a per-project public and shared
> repository ?
> ...I'm a bit lost

Just think about who has to see whose commits ?

I guess, each project's codebase is accessed by a relatively
small number of people. So it IMHO would be natural to give
each project a separate (blessed) repository. The project
leader will merge (or cherry-pick) the blessed changes here,
and other merge-down or better rebase from there.

If there's some big mainline (the base for many other projects),
it should live in its own repository. BTW: you dont have to use
full clones - you could also fetch individual refs if you like.

Individual WIP branches probably dont necessarily need to be pushed
into the central project repos - devs could sync each other
selectively.


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt@metux.de
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-06 14:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-02 19:53 re:Git enterprise setup on a large project Frederic JECKER
2011-04-02 22:45 ` Git " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-02 19:50 Frederic JECKER
2011-04-03 18:31 ` Enrico Weigelt

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).