From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Enrico Weigelt Subject: Re: Git enterprise setup on a large project Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 20:31:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20110403183115.GA28901@nibiru.local> References: Reply-To: weigelt@metux.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 06 16:00:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7THM-0005GO-MQ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:00:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756138Ab1DFOAJ convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:00:09 -0400 Received: from caprica.metux.de ([82.165.128.25]:58836 "EHLO mailgate.caprica.metux.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756164Ab1DFOAH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:00:07 -0400 Received: from mailgate.caprica.metux.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p36Ds7ue018842 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:58:16 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with UUCP id p36Ca3GH006454 for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:36:03 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id p33IVFlL006470 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 20:31:15 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Frederic JECKER wrote: > What could I do then ? > - Use submodules ? > - Create a blessed per-project repository and instead of a public > repository for each=A0developer=A0create a per-project public and sha= red > repository ? > ...I'm a bit lost Just think about who has to see whose commits ? I guess, each project's codebase is accessed by a relatively small number of people. So it IMHO would be natural to give each project a separate (blessed) repository. The project leader will merge (or cherry-pick) the blessed changes here, and other merge-down or better rebase from there. If there's some big mainline (the base for many other projects), it should live in its own repository. BTW: you dont have to use full clones - you could also fetch individual refs if you like. Individual WIP branches probably dont necessarily need to be pushed into the central project repos - devs could sync each other selectively. cu --=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------