From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Brian Lyles <brianmlyles@gmail.com>, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com, newren@gmail.com,
gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sequencer: Do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:57:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ff4650c-f84f-41bd-a46c-3b845ff29b70@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHPHrSeKY2Ou9VCq6rtADTOwycc0KCTPaCCwtqf94yLi0wj0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Brian
On 27/01/2024 23:30, Brian Lyles wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:23 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19/01/2024 05:59, brianmlyles@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Brian Lyles <brianmlyles@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Previously, a consumer of the sequencer that wishes to take advantage of
>>> either the `keep_redundant_commits` or `drop_redundant_commits` feature
>>> must also specify `allow_empty`.
>>>
>>> The only consumer of `drop_redundant_commits` is `git-rebase`, which
>>> already allows empty commits by default and simply always enables
>>> `allow_empty`. `keep_redundant_commits` was also consumed by
>>> `git-cherry-pick`, which had to specify `allow-empty` when
>>> `keep_redundant_commits` was specified in order for the sequencer's
>>> `allow_empty()` to actually respect `keep_redundant_commits`.
>>
>> I think it might be more persuasive to start the commit message by
>> explaining what user visible change you're trying to make and why rather
>> than concentrating on the implementation details.
>
> I struggled a bit with this initially because the motivation behind the
> change in this particular commit was driven by a technical issue in my
> mind. The side-effect with git-cherry-pick(s) `--allow-empty` and
> `--keep-redundant-commits` was mildly problematic, but less concerning
> that the future problem that we'd have once git-cherry-pick(1) got the
> more robust `--empty` option in a later commit in this series.
>
> I think my problem came down to this commit trying to solve two problems
> at once -- the underlying technical concern _and_ the git-cherry-pick(1)
> behavior.
>
> In v2, I intend to break this commit into two:
>
> - Update `allow_empty()` to not require `allow_empty`, but without
> actually changing any consumers (and thus without making any
> functional change)
> - Update git-cherry-pick(1) such that `--keep-redundant-commits` no
> longer implies `--allow-empty`.
>
> This allows me to better justify the technical change technically and
> the functional change functionally, while also making it easier to drop
> the functional change if we decide that a breaking change is not
> warranted to address this.
That sounds like a good strategy. I'm wondering if we should not change
the behavior of `--keep-redundant-commits` to avoid breaking existing
users but have `--empty=keep|drop` not imply `--allow-empty`. What ever
we do we'll annoy someone. It is confusing to have subtly different
behaviors for `--keep-redundant-commits` and `--empty=keep` but it
avoids breaking existing users. If we change `--keep-redundant-commits`
we potentially upset existing users but we don't confuse others with the
subtle difference between the two.
>> Do you have a practical example of where you want to keep the commits
>> that become empty but not the ones that start empty? I agree there is a
>> distinction but I think the common case is that the user wants to keep
>> both types of empty commit or none. I'm not against giving the user the
>> option to keep one or the other if it is useful but I'm wary of changing
>> the default.
>
> That practical example is documented in the initial discussion[1], which
> I should have ought to have linked in a cover letter for this series
> (and will do so in v2). I'll avoid copying the details here, but we'd
> very much like to be able to programmatically drop the commits that
> become empty when doing the automated cherry-pick described there.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAHPHrSevBdQF0BisR8VK=jM=wj1dTUYEVrv31gLerAzL9=Cd8Q@mail.gmail.com/
Maybe I've missed something but that seems to be an argument for
implementing `--empty=drop` which is completely reasonable but doesn't
explain why someone using `--keep-redundant-commits` would want to keep
the commits that become empty while dropping the commits that start empty.
> [...]
>> Thank you for being clear about the change in behavior, as I said above
>> I'm wary of changing the default unless there is a compelling reason but
>> I'm happy to support
>>
>> git cherry-pick --keep-redundant-commits --no-allow-empty
>>
>> if it is needed.
>
> I totally understand being wary here.
>
> I've certainly convinced myself that having the future `--empty=drop`
> behavior introduced later in this patch should not imply
> `--allow-empty`.
I agree with that
> I also _think_ that the existing behavior of `--keep-redundant-commits`
> is probably technically not ideal or correct, but could be convinced
> that changing it now is not worthwhile. I will defer to group consensus
> here.
There is definitely an argument that the existing behavior conflates the
two flavors of empty commit. I think one can also argue that the
conflation is beneficial as most of the time users don't care about the
distinction when using `--keep-redundant-commits` and so it is not worth
changing the behavior of the existing option.
I sounds like you've got a good plan for v2, I look forward to reading it.
Best Wishes
Phillip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 5:59 [PATCH 1/4] sequencer: Do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options brianmlyles
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] docs: Clean up `--empty` formatting in `git-rebase` and `git-am` brianmlyles
2024-01-23 14:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 21:22 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 14:02 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] rebase: Update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=drop` brianmlyles
2024-01-23 14:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 21:49 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 14:02 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] cherry-pick: Add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling brianmlyles
2024-01-20 20:24 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 18:28 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-21 22:05 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-22 10:40 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-22 20:55 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-23 5:23 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-23 7:11 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-23 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-23 18:41 ` Subject: [PATCH] CoC: whitespace fix Junio C Hamano
2024-01-24 3:06 ` Elijah Newren
2024-01-23 18:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] cherry-pick: Add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Junio C Hamano
2024-01-23 14:25 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-23 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-28 0:07 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-27 23:56 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-20 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] sequencer: Do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 18:19 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-23 14:23 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-23 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-24 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-24 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 23:30 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-28 16:36 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-10 5:50 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 10:57 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2024-02-10 4:34 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] cherry-pick: add `--empty` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:39 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=drop` Brian Lyles
2024-02-11 4:54 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-14 11:05 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-22 16:34 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-22 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] sequencer: treat error reading HEAD as unborn branch Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:34 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-23 5:28 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-25 16:57 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] cherry-pick: decouple `--allow-empty` and `--keep-redundant-commits` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-22 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-23 6:23 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-23 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-25 16:58 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-26 3:04 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-02-11 20:50 ` Jean-Noël AVILA
2024-02-12 1:35 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-23 6:58 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-25 16:57 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-26 2:21 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-26 3:32 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-27 10:39 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-27 17:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 16:12 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sequencer: treat error reading HEAD as unborn branch Brian Lyles
2024-03-11 0:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-11 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-12 2:04 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-12 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-16 3:05 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 15:10 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-16 3:07 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 16:10 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-13 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-16 5:20 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 19:35 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 14:38 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 16:12 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 19:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` Brian Lyles
2024-03-21 9:52 ` Dirk Gouders
2024-03-21 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-21 19:45 ` Dirk Gouders
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-26 14:45 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-26 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-27 16:37 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ff4650c-f84f-41bd-a46c-3b845ff29b70@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=brianmlyles@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).