From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Brian Lyles <brianmlyles@gmail.com>, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com, newren@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] docs: Clean up `--empty` formatting in `git-rebase` and `git-am`
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:02:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ed4a9b2-2318-4424-8173-42c0e61c8dda@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHPHrSdOVoBPR9vJou_Bxmq=4QW_z6nhnzxfmZ1Am0i-GJuz4g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Brian
On 27/01/2024 21:22, Brian Lyles wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:24 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19/01/2024 05:59, brianmlyles@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Brian Lyles <brianmlyles@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Both of these pages document very similar `--empty` options, but with
>>> different styles. This commit aims to make them more consistent.
>>
>> I think that's reasonable though the options they are worded as doing
>> different things. For "am" it talks about the patch being empty - i.e. a
>> patch of an empty commit whereas for "rebase" the option applies to
>> non-empty commits that become empty. What does "am" do if you try to
>> apply a patch whose changes are already present?
>
> Hm -- as you mention, this does appear to have a different meaning for
> git-am(1) than it does for git-rebase(1). Regardless of the `--empty`
> value passed to git-am(1), a non-empty patch that is already present
> appears to error and stop.
>
> That is an unfortunate difference. I think that my updated version of
> the git-am(1) docs is still easier to read, and preserves the original
> meaning. So I'm inclined to say that it's still an improvement worth
> making, and perhaps my commit message should just clarify that.
> Thoughts?
Yes I agree the change is worthwhile but I think it would benefit from
an updated commit message.
>> If you're aiming for consistency then it would be worth listing the
>> possible values in the same order for each command.
>
> That makes sense. I had initially maintained the existing order in which
> these were documented, keeping the default option first. I think that
> the updated layout makes the order less relevant by making it easier to
> read and identify the default anyway.
>
> I could see alphabetical being better, though with the changes later in
> this series we'd end up with the deprecated `ask` being first or
> out-or-order at the end. What are your thoughts on the ideal order for
> these?
Alphabetical sounds reasonable, we could sort on the non deprecated
names with stop and ask grouped together
drop;;
...
keep;;
...
stop;;
ask;;
...
`ask` is a deprecated synonym of `stop`
>>> +`keep`;;
>>> + The empty commit will be kept.
>>> +`ask`;;
>>> + The rebase will halt when the empty commit is applied, allowing you to
>>> + choose whether to drop it, edit files more, or just commit the empty
>>> + changes. This option is implied when `--interactive` is specified.
>>> Other options, like `--exec`, will use the default of drop unless
>>> `-i`/`--interactive` is explicitly specified.
>>
>> Thanks for adding a bit more detail about the default, however it looks
>> to me like we keep commits that become empty when --exec is specified
>>
>> if (options.empty == EMPTY_UNSPECIFIED) {
>> if (options.flags & REBASE_INTERACTIVE_EXPLICIT)
>> options.empty = EMPTY_STOP;
>> else if (options.exec.nr > 0)
>> options.empty = EMPTY_KEEP;
>> else
>> options.empty = EMPTY_DROP;
>> }
>>
>> Off the top of my head I'm not sure why or if that is a good idea.
>
> The two lines indicating this behavior are actually pre-existing -- I
> did not change them in this patch and thus didn't even think to fact
> check them.
>
> Upon testing this, I've confirmed that you are correct about the actual
> behavior. I will address this in a separate commit in v2.
Thanks, I'd missed that those were context lines in the diff.
Best Wishes
Phillip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 5:59 [PATCH 1/4] sequencer: Do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options brianmlyles
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] docs: Clean up `--empty` formatting in `git-rebase` and `git-am` brianmlyles
2024-01-23 14:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 21:22 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 14:02 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] rebase: Update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=drop` brianmlyles
2024-01-23 14:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 21:49 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 14:02 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-19 5:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] cherry-pick: Add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling brianmlyles
2024-01-20 20:24 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 18:28 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-21 22:05 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-22 10:40 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-22 20:55 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-23 5:23 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-23 7:11 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-23 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-23 18:41 ` Subject: [PATCH] CoC: whitespace fix Junio C Hamano
2024-01-24 3:06 ` Elijah Newren
2024-01-23 18:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] cherry-pick: Add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Junio C Hamano
2024-01-23 14:25 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-23 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-28 0:07 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-27 23:56 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-20 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] sequencer: Do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-01-21 18:19 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-23 14:23 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-23 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-24 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-24 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2024-01-27 23:30 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-28 16:36 ` Brian Lyles
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-10 5:50 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-01 10:57 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-10 4:34 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] cherry-pick: add `--empty` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:39 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=drop` Brian Lyles
2024-02-11 4:54 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-14 11:05 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-22 16:34 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-22 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] sequencer: treat error reading HEAD as unborn branch Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:34 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-23 5:28 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-25 16:57 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] cherry-pick: decouple `--allow-empty` and `--keep-redundant-commits` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-22 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:35 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-23 6:23 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-23 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-25 16:58 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-26 3:04 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-02-11 20:50 ` Jean-Noël AVILA
2024-02-12 1:35 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-22 16:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-23 6:58 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-25 16:57 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-26 2:21 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-26 3:32 ` Brian Lyles
2024-02-27 10:39 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-27 17:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 16:12 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sequencer: treat error reading HEAD as unborn branch Brian Lyles
2024-03-11 0:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-11 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-12 2:04 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-12 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-16 3:05 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 15:10 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-16 3:07 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-10 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-03-13 16:10 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-13 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-16 5:20 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 19:35 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 14:38 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 16:12 ` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 19:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` Brian Lyles
2024-03-21 9:52 ` Dirk Gouders
2024-03-21 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-21 19:45 ` Dirk Gouders
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Brian Lyles
2024-03-26 14:45 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-26 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-27 16:37 ` phillip.wood123
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] docs: address inaccurate `--empty` default with `--exec` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] docs: clean up `--empty` formatting in git-rebase(1) and git-am(1) Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] rebase: update `--empty=ask` to `--empty=stop` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] sequencer: handle unborn branch with `--allow-empty` Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] sequencer: do not require `allow_empty` for redundant commit options Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] cherry-pick: enforce `--keep-redundant-commits` incompatibility Brian Lyles
2024-03-25 23:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] cherry-pick: add `--empty` for more robust redundant commit handling Brian Lyles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ed4a9b2-2318-4424-8173-42c0e61c8dda@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=brianmlyles@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).