list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <>
To: Felipe Contreras <>
Cc:, Junio C Hamano <>,
	Jeff King <>, Jonathan Nieder <>,
	Dominik Salvet <>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add fetch.updateHead option
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:30:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Wed, Nov 18 2020, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> Users might change the behavior when running "git fetch" so that the
> remote's HEAD symbolic ref is updated at certain point.
> For example after running "git remote add" the remote HEAD is not
> set like it is with "git clone".
> Setting "fetch.updatehead = missing" would probably be a sensible
> default that everyone would want, but for now the default behavior is to
> never update HEAD, so there shouldn't be any functional changes.
> For the next major version of Git, we might want to change this default.
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <>
> ---
> This is just a RFC, the tests are missing.

I haven't taken much time to re-think through the patch/implications of
this, but I remember running into this and going through some pre-patch
investigation at some point.

It's really annoying in some cases that "clone" isn't creating the same
state as "remote". IIRC I was doing some heuristics to figure out the
remote branch name etc.

Isn't this something we can just change without an option? There were a
bunch of cases in clone/fetch that were different for no different
reasons, IIRC I patched one or two of those in the past. But I haven't
gone through the history of the feature and checked if it was

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18  9:12 Felipe Contreras
2020-11-18  9:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2020-11-18  9:43   ` Felipe Contreras
2020-11-18 15:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-18 19:04     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-11-20 23:52 ` Jeff King
2020-11-21  0:28   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-21  0:40     ` Jeff King
2020-11-21  1:18       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-11-24  6:58         ` Jeff King
2020-11-21  1:53     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-11-21  1:41   ` Felipe Contreras
2020-11-24  7:09     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add fetch.updateHead option' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).