git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jgfouca@sandia.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:20:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v4o1y81sv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1307518278-23814-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com

Unfortunately I seem to have found a regression that manifests in the real
life.

When this series is merged to 'next', it mismerges a trivial renamed path.
A sample commit to reproduce is 2d11f21c3, which is a merge between
28b9264dd6 and 5b42477b59.  Check out the former and try to merge in the
latter.

The merge base of these two commits is 2cfe8a68ccb (no criss-cross).

One branch (current one, 28b9264dd6) does not have that path, but it does
have t/t4037-whitespace-status.sh:

    $ git ls-tree 28b9264dd6 t/t4037-whitespace-status.sh
    100755 blob 3c728a3ebf9ce52e5c24c81525d5cb749cfb2957 t/t4037-whitespace-status.sh

What happened to that path on the current branch is this:

    $ git log -m -M --raw --pretty=short 2cfe8a68ccb..28b9264dd6 -- \
      t/t40{37,40}-whitespace-status.sh
    commit af7b41c923677ff9291bab56ec7069922e37453b
    Author: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>

        diff_tree: disable QUICK optimization with diff filter

    :100755 100755 abc4934... 3c728a3... M  t/t4037-whitespace-status.sh

In other words, we had t4037, and we have t4037 but we updated its
contents from abc4934 to 3c728a3.

Running "log -m -M --raw --pretty=short 2cfe8a68ccb..5b42477b59" shows
that the merged branch (5b42477b59) has renamed t4037 to t4040 at
0e098b6d:

    commit 0e098b6d79fbcab763874f2b6fde5aa82144d150
    Author: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>

        Make test case number unique

    :100755 100755 a30b03b... a30b03b... R100 t/t4037-whitespace-status.sh    t/t4040-wh..

This commit is on a side-branch that has not been merged at the merge base
2cfe8a68ccb; its contents a30b03b is older than what 2cfe8a68ccb has, and
was updated by 2cfe8a68ccb to abc4934.

Another merge after this commit updated it at 7d0cf357:

    commit 7d0cf357a31cc8a442342696788d776265482ce9 (from 98b256bd...)
    Merge: 98b256b 2cfe8a6
    Author: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

        Merge branch 'jc/maint-diff-q-filter'

    :100755 100755 a30b03b... abc4934... M  t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh

This abc4934 is the same contents as the merge base had at t4037.

So this is an "our side kept t4037 and updated its contents from abc4934
to 3c728a3, while the other side renamed t4037 to t4040 and kept its
contents as abc4934". We should merge this as structural change "our side
left it untouched, their side renamed, so take the rename without
conflict" and content level change "our side updated but their side left
it untouched, so take our modification without conflict".

In other words, in the result, we should have 3c728a3 at t4040, and that
indeed is what we got in the recorded history:

    $ git ls-tree 2d11f21c3 -- t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh
    100755 blob 3c728a3ebf9ce52e5c24c81525d5cb749cfb2957 t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh

However, the merge retried with this series cleanly resolves the path, but
with wrong contents:

    $ git checkout 28b9264dd6
    $ git merge 5b42477b59
    $ git ls-files -s t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh
    100755 abc49348b196cf0fec232b6f2399356e4fe324d5 0 t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh

Correct answer should be:

    $ git ls-files -s t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh
    100755 3c728a3ebf9ce52e5c24c81525d5cb749cfb2957 0 t/t4040-whitespace-status.sh

I am rewinding today's integration of 'next' to unmerge this topic
now. :-(...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-04  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-08  7:30 [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 01/48] t6039: Add a testcase where git deletes an untracked file Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 02/48] t6039: Add failing testcase for rename/modify/add-source conflict Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 03/48] t6039: Add a pair of cases where undetected renames cause issues Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 04/48] t6039: Add a testcase where undetected rename causes silent file deletion Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 05/48] t6039: Add tests for content issues with modify/rename/directory conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 15:49     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 06/48] t6039: Add failing testcases for rename/rename/add-{source,dest} conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 07/48] t6039: Ensure rename/rename conflicts leave index and workdir in sane state Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 17:59     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 08/48] t6036: Add differently resolved modify/delete conflict in criss-cross test Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 09/48] t6036: criss-cross with weird content can fool git into clean merge Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 18:02     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 10/48] t6036: tests for criss-cross merges with various directory/file conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:07     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 11/48] t6036: criss-cross w/ rename/rename(1to2)/modify+rename/rename(2to1)/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 12/48] t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + modify/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-20 23:15     ` Phil Hord
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 13/48] t6022: Remove unnecessary untracked files to make test cleaner Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 14/48] t6022: New tests checking for unnecessary updates of files Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 15/48] t6022: Add testcase for merging a renamed file with a simple change Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 16/48] merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newline Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 17/48] merge-recursive: Correct a comment Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 18/48] merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments const Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 19/48] merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path names Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 20/48] merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 21/48] merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflict Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 22/48] merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptions Elijah Newren
2011-07-11  7:04   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-12  7:27     ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13  7:24       ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13 20:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:21     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 23/48] merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being present Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 24/48] merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking them Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 25/48] merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked() Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 26/48] merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries Elijah Newren
2011-07-11  7:14   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13  7:17   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-08 20:56     ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-09  7:01       ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 27/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functions Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 28/48] merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at end Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 29/48] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 30/48] merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 31/48] merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undead Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 32/48] merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source cases Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 33/48] merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 34/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry() Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 35/48] merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_info Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 36/48] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 37/48] merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:09     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 38/48] merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 39/48] merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base Elijah Newren
2011-07-25 20:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:58     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 40/48] merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2 Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 41/48] merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 42/48] merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 43/48] merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 44/48] merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 45/48] merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 46/48] merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 47/48] merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 48/48] merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add Elijah Newren
2011-06-11 18:12 ` [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Junio C Hamano
     [not found]   ` <BANLkTimd0O70e7KhT-G5quxQhF_Nwc30Hg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-12  6:18     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-12  6:28       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04  0:20 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2011-08-04  1:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04  2:12     ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 17:26   ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 19:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 19:16       ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-06  5:22         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-06 20:31           ` Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v4o1y81sv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jgfouca@sandia.gov \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).