git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgfouca@sandia.gov, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 44/48] merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2011 01:31:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307518278-23814-45-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307518278-23814-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>

Our previous conflict resolution for renaming two different files to the
same name ignored the fact that each of those files may have modifications
from both sides of history to consider.  We need to do a three-way merge
for each of those files, and then handle the conflict of both sets of
merged contents trying to be recorded with the same name.

It is important to note that this changes our strategy in the recursive
case.  After doing a three-way content merge of each of the files
involved, we still are faced with the fact that we are trying to put both
of the results (including conflict markers) into the same path.  We could
do another two-way merge, but I think that becomes confusing.  Also,
taking a hint from the modify/delete and rename/delete cases we handled
earlier, a more useful "common ground" would be to keep the three-way
content merge but record it with the original filename.  The renames can
still be detected, we just allow it to be done in the o->call_depth=0
case.  This seems to result in simpler & easier to understand merge
conflicts as well, as evidenced by some of the changes needed in our
testsuite in t6036.  (However, it should be noted that this change will
cause problems those renames also occur along with a file being added
whose name matches the source of the rename.  Since git currently cannot
detect rename/add-source situations, though, this codepath is not
currently used for those cases anyway.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
 merge-recursive.c                    |   30 ++++++++++++++++++--------
 t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh    |   38 +++++++++-------------------------
 t/t6039-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index b8fd686..ea538e9 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,8 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o,
 	struct diff_filespec *c1 = ci->pair1->two;
 	struct diff_filespec *c2 = ci->pair2->two;
 	char *path = c1->path; /* == c2->path */
+	struct merge_file_info mfi_c1;
+	struct merge_file_info mfi_c2;
 
 	output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
 	       "Rename %s->%s in %s. "
@@ -1078,22 +1080,32 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o,
 	remove_file(o, 1, a->path, would_lose_untracked(a->path));
 	remove_file(o, 1, b->path, would_lose_untracked(b->path));
 
+	mfi_c1 = merge_file_special_markers(o, a, c1, &ci->ren1_other,
+					    o->branch1, c1->path,
+					    o->branch2, ci->ren1_other.path);
+	mfi_c2 = merge_file_special_markers(o, b, &ci->ren2_other, c2,
+					    o->branch1, ci->ren2_other.path,
+					    o->branch2, c2->path);
+
 	if (o->call_depth) {
-		struct merge_file_info mfi;
-		mfi = merge_file(o, path, null_sha1, 0,
-				 c1->sha1, c1->mode,
-				 c2->sha1, c2->mode,
-				 ci->branch1, ci->branch2);
-		output(o, 1, "Adding merged %s", path);
-		update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
+		/*
+		 * If mfi_c1.clean && mfi_c2.clean, then it might make
+		 * sense to do a two-way merge of those results.  But, I
+		 * think in all cases, it makes sense to have the virtual
+		 * merge base just undo the renames; they can be detected
+		 * again later for the non-recursive merge.
+		 */
+		remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
+		update_file(o, 0, mfi_c1.sha, mfi_c1.mode, a->path);
+		update_file(o, 0, mfi_c2.sha, mfi_c2.mode, b->path);
 	} else {
 		char *new_path1 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch1);
 		char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2);
 		output(o, 1, "Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
 		       a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2);
 		remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
-		update_file(o, 0, c1->sha1, c1->mode, new_path1);
-		update_file(o, 0, c2->sha1, c2->mode, new_path2);
+		update_file(o, 0, mfi_c1.sha, mfi_c1.mode, new_path1);
+		update_file(o, 0, mfi_c2.sha, mfi_c2.mode, new_path2);
 		free(new_path2);
 		free(new_path1);
 	}
diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index a1b609f..5c3868a 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -51,23 +51,15 @@ test_expect_success 'merge simple rename+criss-cross with no modifications' '
 
 	test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
 
-	test 5 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
-	test 3 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
-	test 0 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
 
-	test $(git rev-parse :0:one) = $(git rev-parse L2:one) &&
-	test $(git rev-parse :0:two) = $(git rev-parse R2:two) &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
 
-	cp one merged &&
-	>empty &&
-	test_must_fail git merge-file \
-		-L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
-		-L "" \
-		-L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
-		merged empty two &&
-	test $(git rev-parse :1:three) = $(git hash-object merged)
+	test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
 '
 
 #
@@ -126,25 +118,15 @@ test_expect_success 'merge criss-cross + rename merges with basic modification'
 
 	test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
 
-	test 5 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
-	test 3 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
-	test 0 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
 
-	test $(git rev-parse :0:one) = $(git rev-parse L2:one) &&
-	test $(git rev-parse :0:two) = $(git rev-parse R2:two) &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
 
-	head -n 10 two >merged &&
-	cp one merge-me &&
-	>empty &&
-	test_must_fail git merge-file \
-		-L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
-		-L "" \
-		-L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
-		merge-me empty merged &&
-
-	test $(git rev-parse :1:three) = $(git hash-object merge-me)
+	test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
 '
 
 #
diff --git a/t/t6039-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6039-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
index 4d2fd10..86e96d0 100755
--- a/t/t6039-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6039-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename (2to1) + modify/modify' '
 	git commit -m C
 '
 
-test_expect_failure 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' '
+test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' '
 	git checkout B^0 &&
 
 	test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 >out &&
-- 
1.7.6.rc0.62.g2d69f

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-08  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-08  7:30 [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 01/48] t6039: Add a testcase where git deletes an untracked file Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 02/48] t6039: Add failing testcase for rename/modify/add-source conflict Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 03/48] t6039: Add a pair of cases where undetected renames cause issues Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 04/48] t6039: Add a testcase where undetected rename causes silent file deletion Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 05/48] t6039: Add tests for content issues with modify/rename/directory conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 15:49     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 06/48] t6039: Add failing testcases for rename/rename/add-{source,dest} conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 07/48] t6039: Ensure rename/rename conflicts leave index and workdir in sane state Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 17:59     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 08/48] t6036: Add differently resolved modify/delete conflict in criss-cross test Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 09/48] t6036: criss-cross with weird content can fool git into clean merge Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 18:02     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 10/48] t6036: tests for criss-cross merges with various directory/file conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:07     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 11/48] t6036: criss-cross w/ rename/rename(1to2)/modify+rename/rename(2to1)/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 12/48] t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + modify/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-20 23:15     ` Phil Hord
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 13/48] t6022: Remove unnecessary untracked files to make test cleaner Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 14/48] t6022: New tests checking for unnecessary updates of files Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 15/48] t6022: Add testcase for merging a renamed file with a simple change Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 16/48] merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newline Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 17/48] merge-recursive: Correct a comment Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 18/48] merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments const Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 19/48] merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path names Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 20/48] merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 21/48] merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflict Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 22/48] merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptions Elijah Newren
2011-07-11  7:04   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-12  7:27     ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13  7:24       ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13 20:34         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:21     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 23/48] merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being present Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 24/48] merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking them Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 25/48] merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked() Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 26/48] merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries Elijah Newren
2011-07-11  7:14   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13  7:17   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-08 20:56     ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-09  7:01       ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 27/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functions Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 28/48] merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at end Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:30 ` [PATCH 29/48] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 30/48] merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 31/48] merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undead Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 32/48] merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source cases Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 33/48] merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 34/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry() Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 35/48] merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_info Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 36/48] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 37/48] merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:09     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 38/48] merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 39/48] merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base Elijah Newren
2011-07-25 20:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:58     ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 40/48] merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2 Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 41/48] merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 42/48] merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 43/48] merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 45/48] merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 46/48] merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 47/48] merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest Elijah Newren
2011-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 48/48] merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add Elijah Newren
2011-06-11 18:12 ` [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Junio C Hamano
     [not found]   ` <BANLkTimd0O70e7KhT-G5quxQhF_Nwc30Hg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-12  6:18     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-12  6:28       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04  0:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04  1:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04  2:12     ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 17:26   ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 19:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 19:16       ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-06  5:22         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-06 20:31           ` Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307518278-23814-45-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jgfouca@sandia.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).