From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgfouca@sandia.gov, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/48] t6036: tests for criss-cross merges with various directory/file conflicts
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:30:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307518278-23814-11-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307518278-23814-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index dab52a4..4993f67 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -397,4 +397,153 @@ test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict w/ criss-cross+contrived resolution' '
test $(git rev-parse :3:file) = $(git rev-parse E:file)
'
+#
+# criss-cross + d/f conflict via add/add:
+# Commit A: Neither file 'a' nor directory 'a/' exist.
+# Commit B: Introduce 'a'
+# Commit C: Introduce 'a/file'
+# Two different later cases:
+# Commit D1: Merge B & C, keeping 'a' and deleting 'a/'
+# Commit E1: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping 'a/file'
+#
+# Commit D2: Merge B & C, keeping a modified 'a' and deleting 'a/'
+# Commit E2: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping a modified 'a/file'
+#
+# Note: D == D1.
+# Finally, someone goes to merge D1&E1 or D1&E2 or D2&E1. What happens?
+#
+# B D1 or D2
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E1 or E2
+#
+
+test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of directory/file conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >irrelevant-file &&
+ git add irrelevant-file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+
+ git branch B &&
+ git checkout -b C &&
+ mkdir a &&
+ echo 10 >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ echo 5 >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge C &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ rm -rf a/ &&
+ echo 5 >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m D &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ git rm --cached a &&
+ echo 10 >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E1 &&
+ git tag E1 &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ git rm --cached a &&
+ printf "10\n11\n" >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E2 &&
+ git tag E2
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict and handles merge of D & E1 correctly' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ # FIXME: If merge-base could keep both a and a/file in its tree, then
+ # we could this merge would actually be able to succeed.
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E1^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict and handles merge of E1 & D correctly' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ git checkout E1^0 &&
+
+ # FIXME: If merge-base could keep both a and a/file in its tree, then
+ # we could this merge would actually be able to succeed.
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git detects conflict and handles merge of D & E2 correctly' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E2^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E1:a/file)
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file)
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict and handles merge of E2 & D correctly' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ git checkout E2^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E1:a/file)
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file)
+'
+
+
test_done
--
1.7.6.rc0.62.g2d69f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 7:30 [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 01/48] t6039: Add a testcase where git deletes an untracked file Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 02/48] t6039: Add failing testcase for rename/modify/add-source conflict Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 03/48] t6039: Add a pair of cases where undetected renames cause issues Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 04/48] t6039: Add a testcase where undetected rename causes silent file deletion Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 05/48] t6039: Add tests for content issues with modify/rename/directory conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 15:49 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 06/48] t6039: Add failing testcases for rename/rename/add-{source,dest} conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 07/48] t6039: Ensure rename/rename conflicts leave index and workdir in sane state Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 17:59 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 08/48] t6036: Add differently resolved modify/delete conflict in criss-cross test Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 09/48] t6036: criss-cross with weird content can fool git into clean merge Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 18:02 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2011-07-18 23:40 ` [PATCH 10/48] t6036: tests for criss-cross merges with various directory/file conflicts Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:07 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 11/48] t6036: criss-cross w/ rename/rename(1to2)/modify+rename/rename(2to1)/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 12/48] t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + modify/modify Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-20 23:15 ` Phil Hord
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 13/48] t6022: Remove unnecessary untracked files to make test cleaner Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 14/48] t6022: New tests checking for unnecessary updates of files Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 15/48] t6022: Add testcase for merging a renamed file with a simple change Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 16/48] merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newline Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 17/48] merge-recursive: Correct a comment Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 18/48] merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments const Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 19/48] merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path names Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 20/48] merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 21/48] merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflict Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 22/48] merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptions Elijah Newren
2011-07-11 7:04 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-12 7:27 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13 7:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 19:21 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 23/48] merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being present Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 24/48] merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking them Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 25/48] merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked() Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 26/48] merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries Elijah Newren
2011-07-11 7:14 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-13 7:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-08 20:56 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-09 7:01 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 27/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functions Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 28/48] merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at end Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:30 ` [PATCH 29/48] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it Elijah Newren
2011-07-18 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 30/48] merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 31/48] merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undead Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 32/48] merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source cases Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 33/48] merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 34/48] merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry() Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 35/48] merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_info Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 36/48] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 37/48] merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:09 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 38/48] merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 39/48] merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base Elijah Newren
2011-07-25 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-08 22:58 ` Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 40/48] merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2 Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 41/48] merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 42/48] merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 43/48] merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 44/48] merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 45/48] merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 46/48] merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 47/48] merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest Elijah Newren
2011-06-08 7:31 ` [PATCH 48/48] merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add Elijah Newren
2011-06-11 18:12 ` [PATCH 00/48] Handling more corner cases in merge-recursive.c Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <BANLkTimd0O70e7KhT-G5quxQhF_Nwc30Hg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-12 6:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-12 6:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 0:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 1:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 2:12 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 17:26 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-04 19:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-04 19:16 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-06 5:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-06 20:31 ` Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307518278-23814-11-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jgfouca@sandia.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).