mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <>
To: "Martin Ågren" <>,
	"Felipe Contreras" <>
Cc: "Git Mailing List" <>,
	"brian m . carlson" <>,
	"Jeff King" <>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <>,
	"Bagas Sanjaya" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] doc: use asciidoctor to build man pages directly
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 15:26:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <609edce68cff1_43127208aa@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Martin Ågren wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 14:14, Felipe Contreras
> <> wrote:
> >
> > There's no need to use xmlto to build the man pages when modern
> > asciidoctor can do it by itself.
> >
> > This new mode will be active only when USE_ASCIIDOCTOR is set.
> May I suggest incorporating something more like brian's patch here [1],
> so that there's a separate knob for this thing?

Sure. Do you agree with the name? (USE_ASCIIDOCTOR_MANPAGE)

> The commit message is short on details and makes it sound like this is
> it, we're done. But then there are several patches to fix up things.
> Which is a good approach, so that this patch doesn't need to do several
> things at once. This commit message could say something about it, e.g.,
>   The doc-diff here [which doc-diff? see below] is a XYZ-line diff.
>   Large parts of this difference will be addressed in the following
>   patches.

Right. I'll include that.

> About the use of doc-diff: If this commit introduces a new knob rather
> than taking over USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes, the next patch could be Peff's
> patch to doc-diff that compares the two asciidoctor approaches [2], and
> then the next few patches could diff between them. That would get the
> asciidoc-vs-asciidoctor differences out of the way, so you can focus on
> asciidoctor-vs-asciidoctor.

You mean [1]. I think that belongs on the same patch. It's important
that if we do have a new switch, doc-diff is able to use it.

However, I personally don't need such switch, I want to compare
asciidoc-vs-asciidoctor-manpage wholesale.

I want to see *all* the diffs.

> With a separate knob, it would feel like a lot easier decision to take
> something like this. There are over 11000 lines in the doc-diff after
> applying your series, and there's the missing boldness for literals.
> Maybe those differences are all great (I would be missing the bold
> literals, though). If this series doesn't affect someone using
> "vanilla" USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes, we could let this thing cook in master
> and work incrementally on top.

I did notice the missing boldness for literals, and I know how to fix
it. It's a small hack. I also noticed a few small rendering issues.

But from my point of view after my patches this is 98% done. Most of the
remaining diffs are fine, for example:

-GIT-CHECK-REF-FOR(1)              Git Manual              GIT-CHECK-REF-FOR(1)
+GIT-CHECK-REF-FORMAT(1)           Git Manual           GIT-CHECK-REF-FORMAT(1)

That's clearly a bug in asciidoc+docbook. Others are things asciidoctor
renders better, and most are whitespace noise.



Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-14 12:14 [PATCH 00/11] doc: asciidoctor: direct man page creation and fixes Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA Felipe Contreras
2021-05-15  9:32   ` Jeff King
2021-05-15  9:39     ` Jeff King
2021-05-15 12:13       ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-17  8:57         ` Jeff King
2021-05-17 10:53           ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-17 11:39             ` Jeff King
2021-05-17 16:50               ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 02/11] doc: doc-diff: allow more than one flag Felipe Contreras
2021-05-15  9:37   ` Jeff King
2021-05-15 12:11     ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 03/11] doc: doc-diff: set docdate manually Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 15:43   ` Martin Ågren
2021-05-14 20:33     ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 04/11] doc: use asciidoctor to build man pages directly Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 15:38   ` Martin Ågren
2021-05-14 20:26     ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 05/11] doc: asciidoctor: add linkgit macros in man pages Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 06/11] doc: join mansource and manversion Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 07/11] doc: add man pages workaround for asciidoctor Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 08/11] doc: asciidoctor: add hack for xrefs Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 09/11] doc: asciidoctor: add hack to improve links Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 10/11] doc: asciidoctor: add support for baseurl Felipe Contreras
2021-05-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 11/11] doc: asciidoctor: cleanup man page hack Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=609edce68cff1_43127208aa@natae.notmuch \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).