From: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: git@jeffhostetler.com, git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net,
me@ttaylorr.com, Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] config.c: fix msvc compile error
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:16:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559fda9d-80b4-64db-e8a4-a886902f28c3@drbeat.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr2jsxybd.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 24.07.18 20:50, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li> writes:
>
>> On 24.07.18 20:22, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>>> This was already fixed (differently) in
>>>> <20180705183445.30901-1-dev+git@drbeat.li>.
>>>
>>> Thanks for saving me from having to dig the list archive myself.
>>> Yes, it is already applied to the tip of the topic that originally
>>> caused the breakage.
>>>
>> Just a general question:
>>
>> Is it OK to refer to patches on pu with the Message-ID, or would you
>> prefer the commit hash? The hash changes whenever you recreate pu,
>> doesn't it?
>
> Either is fine in practice. The commits themselves on a topic
> branch that is not yet in 'next' usually stay the same once the tip
> of 'pu' that contains them gets published. Even though I often use
> "git rebase -i", "git commit --amend", etc. to fix up posted patches
> while turning them into commits on topic branches, I usually stop
> doing so once I push out day's integration result.
>
> Until a new version of the series is posted to replace them on the
> topic branch, that is. But at that point we are talking about new
> patches with different message-ids that got turned into different
> commit objects, so either commit object name or message id that
> refer to older iteration would still name the same old version, and
> new names would refer to the same new version.
>
Ok, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-24 15:30 [PATCH v1] config.c: fix msvc compile error git
2018-07-24 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-24 18:16 ` Beat Bolli
2018-07-24 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-24 18:26 ` Beat Bolli
2018-07-24 18:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-24 19:16 ` Beat Bolli [this message]
2018-07-24 19:56 ` Taylor Blau
2018-07-25 12:51 ` Jeff Hostetler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559fda9d-80b4-64db-e8a4-a886902f28c3@drbeat.li \
--to=dev+git@drbeat.li \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).