git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Paul Franz <thefranz@comcast.net>
To: Git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: C++ *for Git*
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:49:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F6A73A.3010203@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85zlzdo3ch.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

To me the methods that an OO class defines is the same thing as an API.  
And you can screw up an API whether it is C++ or C. Both give you the 
same opportunity to screw up the model and create code that needs to be 
re-written.

Paul Franz

David Kastrup wrote:
> "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> On 9/23/07, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:
>>     
>>>> Object oriented languages creates black boxes: that's the reason
>>>> why object oriented exsists and also the reason why Linus hates
>>>> it ;-)
>>>>         
>
>   
>>> So please stop with this myth. And don't speak for people, I would
>>> be very surprised that Linus would dislike "black
>>> boxes". Abstractions are good, when used wisely, and I would be
>>> much surprised to see Linus pretend otherwise.
>>>       
>> From a Linus recent thread:
>>
>>     
>>> In other words, the only way to do good, efficient, and system-level
>>> and portable C++ ends up to limit yourself to all the things that
>>> are basically available in C. And limiting your project to C means
>>> that people don't screw that up, and also means that you get a lot
>>> of programmers that do actually understand low-level issues and
>>> don't screw things up with any idiotic "object model" crap.
>>>       
>> Perhaps I have misunderstood, but the idea I got is that for Linus
>> OO brings in more problems than what it tries to fix.
>>     
>
> I read that as OO bringing in more programmers capable of creating
> problems than those capable of fixing them.
>
> It is not the fault of OO in itself, but it is the bottom line that
> counts: if it draws the wrong audience for the wrong reasons, it
> better had great benefits to offset that.  Not quite unsimilar with
> communism: the idea is great in principle, but the idea has no
> built-in self-check.  Capitalism, in contrast, is a distasteful idea
> at its heart, but it is rooted soundly in individual egoism.  Which
> does not make it any less distasteful, but at least it tends to work.
>
>   

-- 

-------------------------------------------

There are seven sins in the world.
     Wealth without work.
     Pleasure without conscience.
     Knowledge without character.
     Commerce without morality.
     Science without humanity.
     Worship without sacrifice.
     Politics without principle.

   -- Mohandas Gandhi

-------------------------------------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-23 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-22 10:42 C++ *for Git* Dmitry Kakurin
2007-09-22 11:11 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22 12:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-22 15:23   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23  4:54     ` Dmitry Kakurin
2007-09-22 15:15 ` Kyle Rose
2007-09-22 18:08   ` Miles Bader
2007-09-22 18:25     ` [OT] " Kyle Rose
2007-09-22 19:11       ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22 22:50       ` Alex Unleashed
2007-09-23  2:09         ` Frank Lichtenheld
2007-09-23  6:25           ` David Brown
2007-09-23  7:23             ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23  9:29               ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23  9:42                 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23  9:50                   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 10:45                 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-23 13:42                   ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 14:23                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-23 14:45                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 14:37                     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 15:15                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 17:49                       ` Paul Franz [this message]
2007-09-23 16:54                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-23 18:05                       ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 18:30                         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 18:43                           ` Marco Costalba
2007-09-23 19:11                             ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 21:22                       ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-09-23 21:31                         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 23:10                           ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-09-23 22:25                         ` Reece Dunn
2007-09-24 10:46                           ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-09-22 22:24   ` Martin Langhoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F6A73A.3010203@comcast.net \
    --to=thefranz@comcast.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).