From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Dakota Hawkins <dakota@dakotahawkins.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] doc/gitattributes: mention non-recursive behavior
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:14:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180320041454.GA15213@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180320040411.GB12938@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:04:11AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > I guess my takeaway is that it would be _good_ if the gitattributes
> > documentation contained the caveat about not matching directories
> > recursively, but _great_ if gitattributes and gitignore (and whatever
> > else there is) were consistent.
>
> I agree it would be nice if they were consistent (and pathspecs, too).
> But unfortunately at this point there's a maze of backwards
> compatibility to deal with.
So let's not forget to do the easy half there. Here's a patch.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] doc/gitattributes: mention non-recursive behavior
The gitattributes documentation claims that the pattern
rules are largely the same as for gitignore. However, the
rules for recursion are different.
In an ideal world, we would make them the same (if for
nothing else than consistency and simplicity), but that
would create backwards compatibility issues. For some
discussion, see this thread:
https://public-inbox.org/git/slrnkldd3g.1l4.jan@majutsushi.net/
But let's at least document the differences instead of
actively misleading the user by claiming that they're the
same.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
Documentation/gitattributes.txt | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
index d52b254a22..1094fe2b5b 100644
--- a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
@@ -56,9 +56,16 @@ Unspecified::
When more than one pattern matches the path, a later line
overrides an earlier line. This overriding is done per
-attribute. The rules how the pattern matches paths are the
-same as in `.gitignore` files; see linkgit:gitignore[5].
-Unlike `.gitignore`, negative patterns are forbidden.
+attribute.
+
+The rules by which the pattern matches paths are the same as in
+`.gitignore` files (see linkgit:gitignore[5]), with a few exceptions:
+
+ - negative patterns are forbidden
+
+ - patterns that match a directory do not recursively match paths
+ inside that directory (so using the trailing-slash `path/` syntax is
+ pointless in an attributes file; use `path/**` instead)
When deciding what attributes are assigned to a path, Git
consults `$GIT_DIR/info/attributes` file (which has the highest
--
2.17.0.rc0.402.ged0b3fd1ee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-20 1:49 .gitattributes override behavior (possible bug, or documentation bug) Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 2:34 ` Jeff King
2018-03-20 3:10 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 3:17 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 4:12 ` Jeff King
2018-03-20 4:04 ` Jeff King
2018-03-20 4:14 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-03-20 4:28 ` [PATCH] doc/gitattributes: mention non-recursive behavior Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 16:41 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-03-21 6:50 ` Jeff King
2018-03-21 16:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-03-23 9:12 ` Jeff King
2018-03-20 4:25 ` .gitattributes override behavior (possible bug, or documentation bug) Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 4:40 ` Jeff King
2018-03-20 4:49 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 16:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-03-21 3:22 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-21 6:52 ` Jeff King
2018-03-21 7:36 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-21 7:44 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-21 7:50 ` Jeff King
2018-03-21 8:35 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-21 8:36 ` Jeff King
2018-03-21 16:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-21 16:07 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-03-20 3:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-20 3:40 ` Dakota Hawkins
2018-03-20 3:45 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180320041454.GA15213@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dakota@dakotahawkins.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).