git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Brian Malehorn <bmalehorn@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] commit.c: skip scissors when computing trailers
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 04:52:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512085253.p3oohlbu2utco2tk@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512050347.30765-4-bmalehorn@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:03:47PM -0700, Brian Malehorn wrote:

> "scissors" ("----- >8 -----") can be automatically added to commit
> messages by setting commit.verbose = true. Prevent this from interfering
> with trailer calculations by automatically skipping over scissors,
> instead of (usually) treating them as a comment.

What's the sequence of commands where you end up with a scissors line in
your "commit -v" output and it gets fed to interpret-trailers? Is it
when you run interpret-trailers from a commit-msg hook? Or do we invoke
it as part of "commit -v" itself?

I ask because I think we can probably come up with a more realistic
test, which may impact what the solution looks like (see below).
Grepping for ignore_non_trailer(), it looks like the issue may be the
append_signoff() call in builtin/commit.c? I couldn't get "git commit -s
-v" to fail, though (it handles the signoff with the verbose bits
removed).

> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 041cfa5a9..9a7b41d09 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -1701,10 +1701,10 @@ int is_scissors_line(const char *line)
>  /*
>   * Inspect the given string and determine the true "end" of the log message, in
>   * order to find where to put a new Signed-off-by: line.  Ignored are
> - * trailing comment lines and blank lines, and also the traditional
> - * "Conflicts:" block that is not commented out, so that we can use
> - * "git commit -s --amend" on an existing commit that forgot to remove
> - * it.
> + * trailing comment lines and blank lines.  To support "git commit -s
> + * --amend" on an existing commit, we also ignore "Conflicts:".  To
> + * support "git commit -v", we truncate at "---- >8 ----" and similar
> + * scissors lines.
>   *
>   * Returns the number of bytes from the tail to ignore, to be fed as
>   * the second parameter to append_signoff().
> @@ -1723,6 +1723,11 @@ int ignore_non_trailer(const char *buf, size_t len)
>  		else
>  			next_line++;
>  
> +		if (is_scissors_line(&buf[bol])) {
> +			if (!boc)
> +				boc = bol;
> +			break;
> +		}

This unconditionally ignores scissors lines. But that means if you have
any inside your commit message, we may quietly corrupt the commit
message. It would be better to remove the scissors lines only when we
know that we've added them.

And that's part of my question above. If this is a call happening inside
builtin/commit.c, then we definitely know when we've added scissors. But
if it's interpret-trailers being run by a hook, passing the information
down to this function is a little tricky.

Maybe I'm being overly picky. We already do a lot of gross heuristic
stuff here like skipping comments and old-style Conflicts blocks (that
we don't even generate anymore!).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-12  5:03 [PATCH 0/3] interpret-trailers + commit -v bugfix Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12  5:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] mailinfo.c: is_scissors_line ends on newline Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12  8:31   ` Jeff King
2017-05-12  5:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit.c: add is_scissors_line Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12  8:40   ` Jeff King
2017-05-12  5:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit.c: skip scissors when computing trailers Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12  8:52   ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-05-12  9:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] interpret-trailers + commit -v bugfix Jeff King
2017-05-14  3:39   ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14  3:39     ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: obey scissors lines Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14  3:56       ` Jeff King
2017-05-14  8:33         ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14  8:33           ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-15  3:55             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15  4:23               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-16  6:06                 ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-16  6:06                   ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: honor the cut line Brian Malehorn
2017-05-16  6:42                   ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: obey scissors lines Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15  3:08           ` Jeff King
2017-05-15  2:12         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15  3:07           ` Jeff King
2017-05-15  3:32             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15  3:33               ` Jeff King
2017-05-14  7:02       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170512085253.p3oohlbu2utco2tk@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=bmalehorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).