From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy <Vaseeharan.Vinayagamoorthy@arm.com>,
Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Cc: "bug-gnulib@gnu.org" <bug-gnulib@gnu.org>,
"libc-alpha@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] posix: Sync regex code with gnulib
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:05:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a315640b-538d-0444-99ef-4c90ce0b86b0@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <385AE4F6-56ED-4A40-A936-F00C21D1BFEE@arm.com>
Right, this did not showed up on build-many-glibc.py. My plan is to touch
as little code as possible since we are in slush freeze and sync again with
gnulib once we set development for 2.34.
I will fix this as well.
On 20/01/2021 12:32, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> Thanks for the fix, Adhemerval Zanella.
> I assume you would fix this in other files too, for example I think a similar patch is needed for posix/fnmatch.c.
>
> fnmatch.c:67:26: error: "__clang_major__" is not defined [-Werror=undef]
> # if (__GNUC__ >= 7) || (__clang_major__ >= 10)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> On 20/01/2021, 11:27, "Adhemerval Zanella" <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/01/2021 23:55, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > On 1/19/21 7:43 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> >> Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> >>> -# if (__GNUC__ >= 7) || (__clang_major__ >= 10)
> >>> +# if (__GNUC__ >= 7) || (defined __clang_major__ &&__clang_major__ >= 10)
> >> I would write it as:
> >>
> >> +# if (__GNUC__ >= 7) || (defined __clang__ && __clang_major__ >= 10)
> >
> > This line should be used only if _LIBC is defined, so we can simplify it to just "#if __GNUC__ >= 7" and thus not worry about Clang.
> >
> > I see that Gnulib wasn't consistent about this, so I installed the attached patch to Gnulib to fix the issue here and elsewhere. The idea is that the Gnulib regex_internal.h can be copied back to glibc, and that the other uses in Gnulib should be similar.
>
> Thanks, I will check with a bootstrap build and sync regex_internal.h
> with glibc.
>
> >
> > On 1/19/21 6:43 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> >
> >> Paul, this seemed to a common pattern scatter on multiple file in gnulib.
> >> Wouldn't be better to consolidate it on cdefs.h?
> >
> > We could append something like the following to cdefs.h, and switch to __attribute_fallthrough__ for modules shared between the two systems. Is that something you'd like to pursue? (We should also sync Gnulib cdefs.h back to glibc of course.)
> >
> > #if defined __STDC_VERSION__ && 201710L < __STDC_VERSION__
> > # define __attribute_fallthrough__ [[__fallthrough__]]
> > #elif __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || __glibc_has_attribute (__fallthrough__)
> > # define __attribute_fallthrough__ __attribute__ ((__fallthrough__))
> > #else
> > # define __attribute_fallthrough__ ((void) 0)
> > #endif
>
> Yes, for 2.34 I will send some patches to sync the remaining gnulib
> files and document from our part the shared files.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-30 20:15 [PATCH 1/5] posix: Sync regex code with gnulib Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] posix: Sync glob " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-31 21:47 ` Paul Eggert
2020-12-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] Sync intprops.h " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-31 21:47 ` Paul Eggert
2020-12-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] Sync flexmember.h " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-31 21:48 ` Paul Eggert
2020-12-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] posix: Sync fnmatch " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-12-31 21:54 ` Paul Eggert
2020-12-31 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] posix: Sync regex code " Paul Eggert
2021-01-19 14:16 ` Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy
2021-01-19 14:43 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-19 15:43 ` Bruno Haible
2021-01-20 2:55 ` Paul Eggert
2021-01-20 11:27 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-20 15:32 ` Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy
2021-01-20 16:05 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2021-01-20 17:46 ` Paul Eggert
2021-01-19 16:52 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-19 17:11 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-19 17:16 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-19 17:18 ` Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a315640b-538d-0444-99ef-4c90ce0b86b0@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=Vaseeharan.Vinayagamoorthy@arm.com \
--cc=bruno@clisp.org \
--cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).