bug-gnulib@gnu.org mirror (unofficial)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Subject: Re: gnulib-tool.py: Remove a redundant function.
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:24:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77cae641-4960-48ea-adf5-6ef28edb658d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6735697.07rScijWmr@nimes>

Hi Bruno,

On 4/15/24 7:58 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Patch 0002 is not applicable because it relies on 0001, which was not good.

Yes, I need to rewrite it. But I think the idea of the patch is still
correct. Since it doesn't make sense to accept a list and then only
use it with one element lists.

> Also, the last hunk makes use of yet another Python built-in function 'zip',
> where list comprehension [ ... for ... in ... ] is more readable.

Maybe I am missing something, but I don't think there is a good way to
use a list comprehension here without 'zip'. Since 'zip' is used to
combine these two lists like so:

        list1 = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
        list2 = [ 5, 6, 7, 8 ]
        result = list(zip(list1, list2))
        print(result)
        [(1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 7), (4, 8)]

This still uses 'zip' but maybe you find it easier to read?

     result = [ (a, b) for
                a, b in zip(list1, list2) ]

> In gnulib-tool.sh the directories are created ahead of the loop that
> copies the files. Why? Because when we have to create 500 files in the
> lib/ directory, it is faster to do 'if not isdir(dirname)' once than
> 500 times. This is also true in Python.

Ah, yes that makes sense. I'll go fix that now.

Collin


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15  1:23 gnulib-tool.py: Remove a redundant function Collin Funk
2024-04-15  2:20 ` Collin Funk
2024-04-15 14:58   ` Bruno Haible
2024-04-15 15:24     ` Collin Funk [this message]
2024-04-16 15:09       ` Bruno Haible
2024-04-16 16:23         ` Collin Funk
2024-04-17  1:12         ` Refactoring rewrite_filename functions Collin Funk
2024-04-17  1:35           ` Bruno Haible
2024-04-17  2:08             ` Collin Funk
2024-04-17 14:03               ` Bruno Haible
2024-04-15 11:47 ` gnulib-tool.py: Remove a redundant function Bruno Haible
2024-04-15 14:07   ` Collin Funk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77cae641-4960-48ea-adf5-6ef28edb658d@gmail.com \
    --to=collin.funk1@gmail.com \
    --cc=bruno@clisp.org \
    --cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).