git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	"Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"David Turner" <novalis@novalis.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:23:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ba16176-b388-4c70-a479-fda4c9244e67@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209195812.dbbmko4sas3wtdy5@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On 02/09/2017 08:58 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 02:26:57PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> [...]
>> A `files_ref_store` would be perfectly happy to represent, say, the
>> references *physically* stored in a linked worktree (e.g., `HEAD`,
>> `refs/bisect/*`, etc) even though that is not the complete collection
>> of refs that are *logically* visible from that worktree (which
>> includes references from the main repository, too). But the old code
>> was confusing the two things by storing "submodule" in every
>> `ref_store` instance.
>>
>> So push the submodule attribute down to the `files_ref_store` class
>> (but continue to let the `ref_store`s be looked up by submodule).
> 
> I'm not sure I understand all of the ramifications here. It _sounds_ like
> pushing this down into the files-backend code would make it harder to
> have mixed ref-backends for different submodules. Or is this just
> pushing down an implementation detail of the files backend, and future
> code is free to have as many different ref_stores as it likes?

I don't understand how this would make it harder, aside from the fact
that a new backend class might also need a path member and have to
maintain its own copy rather than using one that the base class provides.

I consider it an implementation detail of the files backend that it
needs to keep a permanent record of its submodule path in
files_ref_store. Some hypothetical future backend might instead need,
say, an IP number and port to connect to a MySQL server. A hypothetical
pure packed-refs backend might just store the path of the packed-refs file.

A more likely imminent change is that backends need a path, but that the
path needn't correspond to the git_dir of the repository that contains
the corresponding objects, for example in the case of a linked worktree.
You might ask for the ref_store for a worktree-submodule, and end up
getting a compound object that delegates to one ref_store pointing at
its git_dir and one at its common_dir.

Michael


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09 13:26 [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] refs: store submodule ref stores in a hashmap Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 16:58   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 17:40     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:43       ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 19:32       ` Jeff King
2017-02-09 20:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-10  4:04     ` Jeff King
2017-02-10 10:23     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] refs: push the submodule attribute down Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:03   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 21:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] register_ref_store(): new function Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:20   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 18:14     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 21:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] files_ref_store::submodule: use NULL for the main repository Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:25   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 21:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 21:36     ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] read_loose_refs(): read refs using resolve_ref_recursively() Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:39   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 19:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 19:58 ` Jeff King
2017-02-09 21:23   ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2017-02-10  0:40     ` Jeff King
2017-02-10 10:27       ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-13  2:39       ` Duy Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ba16176-b388-4c70-a479-fda4c9244e67@alum.mit.edu \
    --to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=novalis@novalis.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).