git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:39:30 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213023929.GA24018@duynguyen.vn.dektech.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210004033.cgqmovhvoylad5cf@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:40:33PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:23:35PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> 
> > >> So push the submodule attribute down to the `files_ref_store` class
> > >> (but continue to let the `ref_store`s be looked up by submodule).
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure I understand all of the ramifications here. It _sounds_ like
> > > pushing this down into the files-backend code would make it harder to
> > > have mixed ref-backends for different submodules. Or is this just
> > > pushing down an implementation detail of the files backend, and future
> > > code is free to have as many different ref_stores as it likes?
> > 
> > I don't understand how this would make it harder, aside from the fact
> > that a new backend class might also need a path member and have to
> > maintain its own copy rather than using one that the base class provides.
> 
> Probably the answer is "I'm really confused".
> 
> But here's how my line of reasoning went:
> 
>   Right now we have a main ref-store that points to the submodule
>   ref-stores. I don't know the current state of it, but in theory those
>   could all use different backends.
> 
>   This seems like it's pushing that submodule linkage down into the
>   backend.
> 
> But I think from your response that the answer is no, the thing that is
> being pushed down is not the right way for the main ref store and the
> submodules to be linked.

I think it's more about "pushing out" than "pushing down". Once files
backend takes a path to .git directory, we could have a submodule
ref_store that resolves submodule path to that .git directory,
files-backend will not need to know anything about submodules.

I imagine in future lookup_ref_store() will take a .git path instead
of a submodule path, then iterate through all backends and call the
backend-specific "probe" function to let the backend figure out if
it's the right backend and whatever parameters it needs (e.g. IP
address or path). There would be submodule_lookup_ref_store() wrapper
that converts submodule path to .git path for lookup_ref_store() to
consume.
--
Duy

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09 13:26 [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] refs: store submodule ref stores in a hashmap Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 16:58   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 17:40     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:43       ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 19:32       ` Jeff King
2017-02-09 20:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-10  4:04     ` Jeff King
2017-02-10 10:23     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] refs: push the submodule attribute down Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:03   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 21:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] register_ref_store(): new function Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:20   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 18:14     ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 21:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] files_ref_store::submodule: use NULL for the main repository Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:25   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 21:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 21:36     ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 13:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] read_loose_refs(): read refs using resolve_ref_recursively() Michael Haggerty
2017-02-09 17:39   ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-09 19:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] Store submodules in a hash, not a linked list Junio C Hamano
2017-02-09 19:58 ` Jeff King
2017-02-09 21:23   ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-10  0:40     ` Jeff King
2017-02-10 10:27       ` Michael Haggerty
2017-02-13  2:39       ` Duy Nguyen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170213023929.GA24018@duynguyen.vn.dektech.internal \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=novalis@novalis.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).