* [ruby-core:95187] [Ruby master Bug#16198] Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8
[not found] <redmine.issue-16198.20191002103310@ruby-lang.org>
@ 2019-10-02 10:33 ` hi
2019-10-02 10:37 ` [ruby-core:95188] " hi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: hi @ 2019-10-02 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ruby-core
Issue #16198 has been reported by qyliss (Alyssa Ross).
----------------------------------------
Bug #16198: Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16198
* Author: qyliss (Alyssa Ross)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.4.8
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
In the ruby-2.4.8 tarball, the ruby-2.4.8/gems directory does not
contain the extracted default gems. This is a change from 2.4.7, and is
also not the case in 2.5.7. I would not expect this to change for a
teeny release, and suspect it was a packaging error.
Compare the output of `tar tf ruby-2.4.8.tar.gz ruby-2.4.8/gems` with
`tar tf ruby-2.4.7.tar.gz ruby-2.4.7/gems` and you'll see what I mean.
This broke our packaging scripts in Nixpkgs, and I suspect it will
affect other packagers as well.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [ruby-core:95188] [Ruby master Bug#16198] Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8
[not found] <redmine.issue-16198.20191002103310@ruby-lang.org>
2019-10-02 10:33 ` [ruby-core:95187] [Ruby master Bug#16198] Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8 hi
@ 2019-10-02 10:37 ` hi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: hi @ 2019-10-02 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ruby-core
Issue #16198 has been updated by qyliss (Alyssa Ross).
This can be closed — I see now that it’s a duplicate.
----------------------------------------
Bug #16198: Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16198#change-81819
* Author: qyliss (Alyssa Ross)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.4.8
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
In the ruby-2.4.8 tarball, the ruby-2.4.8/gems directory does not
contain the extracted default gems. This is a change from 2.4.7, and is
also not the case in 2.5.7. I would not expect this to change for a
teeny release, and suspect it was a packaging error.
Compare the output of `tar tf ruby-2.4.8.tar.gz ruby-2.4.8/gems` with
`tar tf ruby-2.4.7.tar.gz ruby-2.4.7/gems` and you'll see what I mean.
This broke our packaging scripts in Nixpkgs, and I suspect it will
affect other packagers as well.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-02 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <redmine.issue-16198.20191002103310@ruby-lang.org>
2019-10-02 10:33 ` [ruby-core:95187] [Ruby master Bug#16198] Packaging regression in ruby-2.4.8 hi
2019-10-02 10:37 ` [ruby-core:95188] " hi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).