ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg.mpls@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:91504] [Ruby trunk Feature#15592] mode where "autoload" behaves like an immediate "require"
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-76764.20190210152000.2915751443b816a3@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-15592.20190207065816@ruby-lang.org

Issue #15592 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).


I'm very in favor of some type of switching mechanism to allow 'autoload' to switch between immediate & lazy loading.

I'll call it 'AorR', for 'autoload or require?'.  I'm confused about the desired scope of this.  Given previously:

```ruby
# m.rb
module M
  autoload :X, 'm/x'
  autoload :Y, 'm/y'
end
```

Two possible options:

1. Adding an optional parameter to autoload to control whether it acts like a require statement.

2. Adding a mechanism to control AorR within a file/module.

Regarding option 1:

It seems like too fine grained a level of control.  After all, one could just require specific files.  Then again, see 'Off-Topic'

Regarding option 2:

I think the idea of being able to place all of the AorR switches in one place (affecting all autoload statements in the app) would be very helpful.  One might also like them in separate places.  Maybe something like a (global) array that contains the namespaces (stored as symbols or strings) where autoload statements switch to requires?  I assume this would become much more complex if it needed to affect previously loaded files.

Off Topic:

The coupling between files and objects has been somewhat tight in many languages.  Obviously, it's not necessarily a one-to-one relationship (example - the io/* std-lib's).  But, one could state that a goal of a higher level language would be to abstract them.  Hence, as an example, an application (or a gem) could totally change their file structure without breaking any applications that use it.


----------------------------------------
Feature #15592: mode where "autoload" behaves like an immediate "require"
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15592#change-76764

* Author: akr (Akira Tanaka)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
How about a feature to switch "autoload" behavior to "require" immediately.

autoload is a feature for lazy loading.

matz dislikes autoload as [Feature #5653].
I heard that he dislikes class (and other) definitions at arbitrary timing.
I agree that eager loading is safer than lazy loading.

However, lazy loading realize shorter loading time and
it makes development cycle shorter.
It is more important for larger applications as Eregon said in
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5653#note-39 .
It is especially important when library loading causes I/O (code generation from DB schema).

These two, safety of eager loading and easier development of lazy loading, conflicts.
But if we can distinguish production mode and development mode,
we can enjoy both benefits.

So, I propose a feature to select autoload behavior from two modes:
- autoload behaves as lazy loading as now in development mode
- autoload behaves as eager loading (immediately invokes "require") in production mode.

There are several idea to switch the mode:

- $AUTOLOAD_MODE = :eager or :lazy
- RubyVM.autoload_mode = :eager or :lazy
- ObjectSpace.autoload_mode = :eager or lazy

I'm not sure there is a good enough one in above list, though.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-10 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-15592.20190207065816@ruby-lang.org>
2019-02-07  6:58 ` [ruby-core:91454] [Ruby trunk Feature#15592] mode that "autoload" behaves "require" immediately akr
2019-02-07 14:35 ` [ruby-core:91472] " merch-redmine
2019-02-07 18:13 ` [ruby-core:91475] " eregontp
2019-02-07 20:21 ` [ruby-core:91477] " fxn
2019-02-07 20:45 ` [ruby-core:91478] " eregontp
2019-02-07 20:47 ` [ruby-core:91479] " eregontp
2019-02-07 20:49 ` [ruby-core:91480] " eregontp
2019-02-07 20:58 ` [ruby-core:91481] " merch-redmine
2019-02-08  0:38 ` [ruby-core:91485] " akr
2019-02-08  6:54 ` [ruby-core:91489] [Ruby trunk Feature#15592] mode where "autoload" behaves like an immediate "require" fxn
2019-02-09 13:36 ` [ruby-core:91501] " akr
2019-02-09 17:47 ` [ruby-core:91502] " fxn
2019-02-10 15:20 ` Greg.mpls [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-76764.20190210152000.2915751443b816a3@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).