ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ruby-core:71348] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] [Open] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
       [not found] <redmine.issue-11659.20151105064342@ruby-lang.org>
@ 2015-11-05  6:43 ` mike
  2015-11-05  6:59 ` [ruby-core:71349] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] " hanmac
  2015-11-07  3:59 ` [ruby-core:71376] " mike
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mike @ 2015-11-05  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #11659 has been reported by Mike Pastore.

----------------------------------------
Bug #11659: Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11659

* Author: Mike Pastore
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.3p173 (2015-08-18 revision 51636) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var1`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> if defined?(var1).nil?; var1 = 'default'; end; var1
=> "default"
~~~

Consider previously-undefined local variables `var1` and `var2`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var2 = 'default' if defined?(var1).nil?; var2
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var3`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var3 = 'default' if true; var3
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var4`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var4 = 'default' if defined?(var4).nil?; var4
=> nil
~~~

Oops! Why is `var4` nil? Logically, considering the prior examples, it should be 'default'. Or are we missing something? 

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33537059/unless-defined-is-not-working-in-my-code



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [ruby-core:71349] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
       [not found] <redmine.issue-11659.20151105064342@ruby-lang.org>
  2015-11-05  6:43 ` [ruby-core:71348] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] [Open] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier mike
@ 2015-11-05  6:59 ` hanmac
  2015-11-07  3:59 ` [ruby-core:71376] " mike
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: hanmac @ 2015-11-05  6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #11659 has been updated by Hans Mackowiak.



~~~
var2 = 'default' if defined?(var1).nil?; var2
~~~

because you got a typo for var2, see the var1 inside.



~~~
var4 = 'default' if defined?(var4).nil?; var4
~~~

the problem there is that var got defined from the parser before the code is run, so when it does check for defined, var4 is already defined




also checkout:

~~~
var = "ok" if false; var #=> nil
~~~


----------------------------------------
Bug #11659: Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11659#change-54717

* Author: Mike Pastore
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.3p173 (2015-08-18 revision 51636) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var1`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> if defined?(var1).nil?; var1 = 'default'; end; var1
=> "default"
~~~

Consider previously-undefined local variables `var1` and `var2`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var2 = 'default' if defined?(var1).nil?; var2
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var3`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var3 = 'default' if true; var3
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var4`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var4 = 'default' if defined?(var4).nil?; var4
=> nil
~~~

Oops! Why is `var4` nil? Logically, considering the prior examples, it should be 'default'. Or are we missing something? 

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33537059/unless-defined-is-not-working-in-my-code



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [ruby-core:71376] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
       [not found] <redmine.issue-11659.20151105064342@ruby-lang.org>
  2015-11-05  6:43 ` [ruby-core:71348] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] [Open] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier mike
  2015-11-05  6:59 ` [ruby-core:71349] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] " hanmac
@ 2015-11-07  3:59 ` mike
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mike @ 2015-11-07  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #11659 has been updated by Mike Pastore.


That's not a typo. :-) I wanted to intentionally compare and contrast between a scenario where the same variable was being checked and set (#2) and a scenario where two different variables are in play (#4). 

I understand about the parser now, and in fact found another question/answer on SO that explains it in a similar manner. So it's not a bug, per se. It is kind of a Ruby "WTF", though, and in this humble Rubyist's opinion violates POLA pretty badly. 

----------------------------------------
Bug #11659: Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11659#change-54747

* Author: Mike Pastore
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.3p173 (2015-08-18 revision 51636) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var1`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> if defined?(var1).nil?; var1 = 'default'; end; var1
=> "default"
~~~

Consider previously-undefined local variables `var1` and `var2`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var2 = 'default' if defined?(var1).nil?; var2
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var3`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var3 = 'default' if true; var3
=> "default"
~~~

Consider a previously-undefined local variable `var4`:

~~~
irb(main):001:0> var4 = 'default' if defined?(var4).nil?; var4
=> nil
~~~

Oops! Why is `var4` nil? Logically, considering the prior examples, it should be 'default'. Or are we missing something? 

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33537059/unless-defined-is-not-working-in-my-code



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-07  3:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <redmine.issue-11659.20151105064342@ruby-lang.org>
2015-11-05  6:43 ` [ruby-core:71348] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] [Open] Strange behavior setting previously-undefined local variables with a statement modifier mike
2015-11-05  6:59 ` [ruby-core:71349] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11659] " hanmac
2015-11-07  3:59 ` [ruby-core:71376] " mike

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).