ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andrewm.bpi@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:66497] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10460] Segfault instead of stack level too deep
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:33:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-50112.20141126223302.8b7b7213f5a0faaf@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-10460.20141030131734@ruby-lang.org

Issue #10460 has been updated by Andrew M.

File rspec_ruby_segfault.rb added
File sample_output added

Ran into this issue today when I accidentally created a stack overflow in my RSpec tests:

* ruby 2.1.5p273 (2014-11-13 revision 48405, [i686-linux]
* rspec 2.13.1

Attached is code which (sometimes) reproduces the problem (run with `rspec rspec_ruby_segfault.rb`), and the output I got when the error occurred.

----------------------------------------
Bug #10460: Segfault instead of stack level too deep
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10460#change-50112

* Author: Arne Brasseur
* Status: Open
* Priority: High
* Assignee: Koichi Sasada
* Category: YARV
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-10-29 trunk 48188) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The code to trigger this can be found here: https://gist.github.com/mbj/31163a8e712573877268

Also have a look at the comments there. A lot of different people tried it, in some cases it segfaults, in others it doesn't. It seems to have to do with version of gcc or specific CFLAGS. 

I can reproduce the problem for 2.1.3, 2.1.4, and trunk.

---Files--------------------------------
rspec_ruby_segfault.rb (233 Bytes)
sample_output (26 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-10460.20141030131734@ruby-lang.org>
2014-10-30 13:17 ` [ruby-core:66023] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10460] [Open] Segfault instead of stack level too deep arne
2014-11-04  9:43 ` [ruby-core:66075] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10460] " arne
2014-11-12  4:17 ` [ruby-core:66219] " a_lamothe
2014-11-18 13:53 ` [ruby-core:66345] " arne
2014-11-19  7:51   ` [ruby-core:66358] " Eric Wong
2014-11-19  7:58 ` [ruby-core:66359] " normalperson
2014-11-19 21:13 ` [ruby-core:66365] " arne
2014-11-19 21:26   ` [ruby-core:66366] " Eric Wong
2014-11-19 21:28 ` [ruby-core:66367] " normalperson
2014-11-26 22:33 ` andrewm.bpi [this message]
2014-11-27 11:23 ` [ruby-core:66520] " ko1
2014-12-03 13:58 ` [ruby-core:66659] " v.ondruch
2014-12-21  1:06 ` [ruby-core:67009] " nobu
2015-02-09 14:17 ` [ruby-core:68074] [Ruby trunk " arne
2015-06-26 10:16 ` [ruby-core:69742] " contact
2019-08-21  3:52 ` [ruby-core:94454] [Ruby master Bug#10460] " merch-redmine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-50112.20141126223302.8b7b7213f5a0faaf@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).