ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:38506] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5060][Closed] Executables in bin folder conflict with their gem versions.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-19687.20110726085021@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-5060.20110720212918@ruby-lang.org


Issue #5060 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

Status changed from Assigned to Closed

Since I committed r32608 and r32611 I think this issue is now invalid.

If a different version of rake or rdoc are installed they will behave the same as the bundled library.  rake _0.9.2.1_ will load the built-in version of rake, for example.  If a newer version of RDoc were installed rdoc and ri would behave the same.

I'm closing this ticket unless differing behavior can be reproduced.
----------------------------------------
Bug #5060: Executables in bin folder conflict with their gem versions.
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5060

Author: Vit Ondruch
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Eric Hodel
Category: 
Target version: 1.9.x
ruby -v: 1.9.3


It would be nice if the executables for rdoc, rake, ri, etc. locate in bin folder, would be standard RubyGems stubs. Otherwise, once there is installed version of such library as a gem, the original file is rewritten and the functionality of bundled library is lost.

But my main concern is the conflict between ruby and gem executables, since it makes packaging for Linux distributions hard (for Fedora and RHEL in my case).


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-25 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20 12:29 [ruby-core:38257] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5060][Open] Executables in bin folder conflict with their gem versions Vit Ondruch
2011-07-25 11:06 ` [ruby-core:38485] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5060][Assigned] " Yui NARUSE
2011-07-25 23:50 ` Eric Hodel [this message]
2012-06-21  5:34 ` [ruby-core:45745] [ruby-trunk " vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
2013-02-17  8:35 ` [ruby-core:52363] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5060] " drbrain (Eric Hodel)
2013-10-14 13:20 ` [ruby-core:57850] " salimane (Salimane Adjao Moustapha)
2017-12-08 14:12 ` [ruby-core:84134] [Ruby trunk Bug#5060] " mame
2017-12-12 14:54 ` [ruby-core:84221] " v.ondruch
2017-12-13  1:55 ` [ruby-core:84229] " hsbt
2018-11-23  2:13 ` [ruby-core:89995] " hsbt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-19687.20110726085021@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).