From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FAB17C26DA for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:36:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F46EA680A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE8C8FC59 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:27 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ryf9XaS9tmIj for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4DE8FC19 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from carbon.ruby-lang.org (carbon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.68]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA1A952423 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539703C21E7DF; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from fluorine.ruby-lang.org (www.rubyist.net [210.251.121.216]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2F63C21EBBC for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from ruby-lang.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fluorine.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348E83ED2F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:21 +0900 (JST) Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:21 +0900 Posted: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:21 +0900 From: Eric Hodel Reply-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: [ruby-core:38506] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5060][Closed] Executables in bin folder conflict with their gem versions. To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-Id: References: X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 38506 X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-core-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= X-Mailer: Redmine X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb3 (2006-10-05) on carbon.ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50,CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_CHINA,RCVD_IN_CHINA_KR,RCVD_IN_TAIWAN, X_MAILER_PRESENT autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7-deb3 X-Redmine-Issue-Author: vo.x X-Redmine-Issue-Assignee: drbrain X-Redmine-Issue-Id: 5060 X-Redmine-Mailinglistintegration-Message-Ids: 7925 X-Redmine-Project: ruby-19 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Redmine-Site: Ruby Issue Tracking System X-Redmine-Host: redmine.ruby-lang.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Precedence: bulk List-Id: ruby-core.ruby-lang.org List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] List-Post: List-Owner: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Issue #5060 has been updated by Eric Hodel. Status changed from Assigned to Closed Since I committed r32608 and r32611 I think this issue is now invalid. If a different version of rake or rdoc are installed they will behave the same as the bundled library. rake _0.9.2.1_ will load the built-in version of rake, for example. If a newer version of RDoc were installed rdoc and ri would behave the same. I'm closing this ticket unless differing behavior can be reproduced. ---------------------------------------- Bug #5060: Executables in bin folder conflict with their gem versions. http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5060 Author: Vit Ondruch Status: Closed Priority: Normal Assignee: Eric Hodel Category: Target version: 1.9.x ruby -v: 1.9.3 It would be nice if the executables for rdoc, rake, ri, etc. locate in bin folder, would be standard RubyGems stubs. Otherwise, once there is installed version of such library as a gem, the original file is rewritten and the functionality of bundled library is lost. But my main concern is the conflict between ruby and gem executables, since it makes packaging for Linux distributions hard (for Fedora and RHEL in my case). -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org