ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "kddnewton (Kevin Newton)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:117732] [Ruby master Bug#20460] Ripper `eval` option
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:37:00 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-20460.20240427193659.10206@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-20460.20240427193659.10206@ruby-lang.org

Issue #20460 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).

----------------------------------------
Bug #20460: Ripper `eval` option
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20460

* Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
* Status: Open
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
There are a couple of differences when producing syntax trees from the parser/ripper when compiling for eval. Namely, for the eval case it does not raise a syntax error for invalid jumps. It would be nice to be able to pass an `eval: true/false` option to `Ripper.sexp`/`Ripper.sexp_raw`/`Ripper.new` to tell it to parse as if it were an `eval`.

Because of some new syntax errors, this had led to bugs like https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20186. If we provide such an option, it could also be useful for debugging purposes.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

           reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <redmine.issue-20460.20240427193659.10206@ruby-lang.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.issue-20460.20240427193659.10206@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).