ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:116456] [Ruby master Feature#20215] Introduce `IO#readable?`
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 05:19:17 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-20215.20240126051916.3344@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-20215.20240126051916.3344@ruby-lang.org

Issue #20215 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

----------------------------------------
Feature #20215: Introduce `IO#readable?`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20215

* Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
There are some cases where, as an optimisation, it's useful to know whether more data is potentially available.

We already have `IO#eof?` but the problem with using `IO#eof?` is that it can block indefinitely for sockets.

Therefore, code which uses `IO#eof?` to determine if there is potentially more data, may hang.

```ruby
def make_request(path = "/")
  client = connect_remote_host
  # HTTP/1.0 request:
  client.write("GET #{path} HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n")

  # Read response
  client.gets("\r\n") # => "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n"

  # Assuming connection close, there are two things the server can do:
  # 1. peer.close
  # 2. peer.write(...); peer.close

  if client.eof? # <--- Can hang here!
    puts "Connection closed"
    # Avoid yielding as we know there definitely won't be any data.
  else
    puts "Connection open, data may be available..."
    # There might be data available, so yield.
    yield(client)
  end
ensure
  client&.close
end

make_request do |client|
  puts client.read # <--- Prefer to wait here.
end
```

The proposed `IO#readable?` is similar to `IO#eof?` but rather than blocking, would simply return false. The expectation is the user will subsequently call `read` which may then wait.

The proposed implementation would look something like this:

```ruby
class IO
  def readable?
    !!self.closed?
  end
end

class BasicSocket
  # Is it likely that the socket is still connected?
  # May return false positive, but won't return false negative.
  def readable?
    return false unless super
    
    # If we can wait for the socket to become readable, we know that the socket may still be open.
    result = self.recv_nonblock(1, MSG_PEEK, exception: false)
    
    # No data was available - newer Ruby can return nil instead of empty string:
    return false if result.nil?
    
    # Either there was some data available, or we can wait to see if there is data avaialble.
    return !result.empty? || result == :wait_readable
    
  rescue Errno::ECONNRESET
    # This might be thrown by recv_nonblock.
    return false
  end
end
```

For `IO` itself, when there is buffered data, `readable?` would also return true immediately, similar to `eof?`. This is not shown in the above implementation as I'm not sure if there is any Ruby method which exposes "there is buffered data".



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

       reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26  5:19 ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core [this message]
2024-02-01  6:19 ` [ruby-core:116546] [Ruby master Feature#20215] Introduce `IO#readable?` shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) via ruby-core
2024-02-01 14:59 ` [ruby-core:116547] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core
2024-02-02 21:06 ` [ruby-core:116561] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core
2024-02-03 17:13 ` [ruby-core:116566] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core
2024-02-03 19:53 ` [ruby-core:116567] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core
2024-02-19 18:44 ` [ruby-core:116851] " forthoney (Seong-Heon Jung) via ruby-core
2024-04-16  1:13 ` [ruby-core:117521] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2024-04-16  9:54 ` [ruby-core:117528] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2024-04-16 17:36 ` [ruby-core:117537] " mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core
2024-04-17  0:07 ` [ruby-core:117541] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2024-04-17  1:13 ` [ruby-core:117542] " akr (Akira Tanaka) via ruby-core
2024-04-17  4:25 ` [ruby-core:117544] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2024-04-17 23:16 ` [ruby-core:117580] " akr (Akira Tanaka) via ruby-core
2024-04-19  1:20 ` [ruby-core:117603] " Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core
2024-04-22  4:06 ` [ruby-core:117636] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2024-04-22  4:08 ` [ruby-core:117637] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.issue-20215.20240126051916.3344@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=noreply@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).