ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ruby-core:72503] Ruby 3.0 in 2017?
@ 2015-12-27  4:45 Eric Wong
  2015-12-30 19:00 ` [ruby-core:72622] " NARUSE, Yui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wong @ 2015-12-27  4:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

It looks like we'll be working on Ruby 2.4 this year for a Christmas
2016 release.  So I guess we won't have Ruby 3.0 won't landing until
Christmas 2017 at earliest?

For what it's worth, I do not look forward to ever having a
backwards-incompatible flag day for 3.0.  Too much has been done
since 1.9 came out to break compatibility.

From a non-Pythonist point-of-view, Python's 2-to-3 transition looks
like a complete mess.  As a long-time (and still daily!) Perl 5 user;
I'm happy to see continued improvements to 5 and don't care at all
for 6, yet.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [ruby-core:72622] Re: Ruby 3.0 in 2017?
  2015-12-27  4:45 [ruby-core:72503] Ruby 3.0 in 2017? Eric Wong
@ 2015-12-30 19:00 ` NARUSE, Yui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NARUSE, Yui @ 2015-12-30 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruby developers

As far as I understand,

1. Matz decides the version to be released.
2. Current trunk is version 2.4, but it doesn't mean 2016-12-25's
release is 2.4. It may change to 3.0 in 2016.
3. Ruby 3.0 must be 3 times faster than Ruby 2. (Ruby 3x3) This means
3.0 won't be released before it.
4. Ruby understands incompatibility needs sufficient benefit.

2015-12-27 13:45 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
> It looks like we'll be working on Ruby 2.4 this year for a Christmas
> 2016 release.  So I guess we won't have Ruby 3.0 won't landing until
> Christmas 2017 at earliest?
>
> For what it's worth, I do not look forward to ever having a
> backwards-incompatible flag day for 3.0.  Too much has been done
> since 1.9 came out to break compatibility.
>
> From a non-Pythonist point-of-view, Python's 2-to-3 transition looks
> like a complete mess.  As a long-time (and still daily!) Perl 5 user;
> I'm happy to see continued improvements to 5 and don't care at all
> for 6, yet.
>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse@airemix.jp>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-30 18:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-27  4:45 [ruby-core:72503] Ruby 3.0 in 2017? Eric Wong
2015-12-30 19:00 ` [ruby-core:72622] " NARUSE, Yui

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).