* Rack multipart - Content-Type implies File IO?
@ 2010-02-18 16:53 mateo
2010-02-18 22:09 ` Mark Goris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: mateo @ 2010-02-18 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rack Development
I found a post about this from may, but no resolution. The problem is
that the multipart parsing treats any part with a content-type as a
file, even if there's no filename in the Content-Disposition. This
isn't a problem with most user agents, but it is with some, and I'm
not sure it makes sense. Any thoughts?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack multipart - Content-Type implies File IO?
2010-02-18 16:53 Rack multipart - Content-Type implies File IO? mateo
@ 2010-02-18 22:09 ` Mark Goris
2010-02-18 22:19 ` Mateo Murphy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Goris @ 2010-02-18 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rack Development
http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435/tickets/79-multipart-handling-incorrectly-assuming-file-upload#ticket-79-8
On Feb 18, 8:53 am, mateo <mateo.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found a post about this from may, but no resolution. The problem is
> that the multipart parsing treats any part with a content-type as a
> file, even if there's no filename in the Content-Disposition. This
> isn't a problem with most user agents, but it is with some, and I'm
> not sure it makes sense. Any thoughts?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack multipart - Content-Type implies File IO?
2010-02-18 22:09 ` Mark Goris
@ 2010-02-18 22:19 ` Mateo Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mateo Murphy @ 2010-02-18 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
Ah, I'd only searched here and had not thought of searching
lighthouse... I'll join the conversation there
Thanks
On 18-Feb-10, at 5:09 PM, Mark Goris wrote:
> http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435/tickets/79-multipart-handling-incorrectly-assuming-file-upload#ticket-79-8
>
> On Feb 18, 8:53 am, mateo <mateo.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found a post about this from may, but no resolution. The problem is
>> that the multipart parsing treats any part with a content-type as a
>> file, even if there's no filename in the Content-Disposition. This
>> isn't a problem with most user agents, but it is with some, and I'm
>> not sure it makes sense. Any thoughts?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-18 22:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-18 16:53 Rack multipart - Content-Type implies File IO? mateo
2010-02-18 22:09 ` Mark Goris
2010-02-18 22:19 ` Mateo Murphy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).