Re: Bloat?

[James Tucker <jftucker@gmail.com>]

On 13 Aug 2009, at 18:49, Joshua Peek wrote:

>
> Here are a few candidates I'd like to see moved into rack-contrib.
>
> Adapter::Camping
> Auth::OpenID
> ContentType
> Recursive
> Session::Memcache

Whilst I sort of agree, doesn't this just shift the bloat problem  
somewhere else?

>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matt Todd<chiology@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday and he mentioned that  
>> thought
>> the Rack package itself seemed to be slightly bloated by things  
>> like Basic
>> Auth et al. He mentioned two things I thought were interesting and  
>> I wanted
>> to get your feedback on it:
>> 1. Like Merb, Rack probably could benefit from using a core and more
>> separation of functionality, and
>> 2. Rack core should only include what's necessary for Rack::Lint to  
>> validate
>> a basic application at minimum.
>> Thoughts?
>> Matt
>> --
>> Matt Todd
>> Highgroove Studios
>> www.highgroove.com
>> cell: 404-314-2612
>> blog: maraby.org
>>
>> Scout - Web Monitoring and Reporting Software
>> www.scoutapp.com
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Joshua Peek