user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Nicolás Ojeda Bär" <n.oje.bar@gmail.com>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: public-inbox-httpd feature request: sort oldest-first
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:03:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPunWhD85aNDEg1Uk_fc1-a9zP+_C431y0YHD0MUHq4JVvV22w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314071304.GA17978@dcvr>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
> Nicolás Ojeda Bär <n.oje.bar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Minor nit about the Subject: this affects the PSGI
> PublicInbox::WWW module, which works best with the bundled
> -httpd, but really can work with any PSGI
> (Perl Server Gateway Interface) server.

Thanks for the clarification.

>> Unless I missed something there does not seem to be a way to sort the
>> message list oldest-to-newest. A little arrow somewhere to invert the
>> order would be nice to have.
>
> Right; it's always favors newest messages.  We usually find
> newer messages more relevant and also git packs are optimized
> for newer data.
>
> I'll take your request into consideration, but am currently
> against this:
>
> I don't want to go down the path of making the WWW interface too
> complex or trying to satisfy everybody with it.  User interface
> is a PERSONAL choice and I want it to remain that way.

I share this point of view. Having said that, _personally_ I still
feel reverse date ordering is an important feature to have in the web
interface.

> The most important part of the WWW interface is it has a stable
> URL format for downloading mboxes and Atom feeds.  These allow
> and encourage users to use their favorite tools locally to
> consume them.  Supporting NNTP is another key to encouraging
> users to choose their own UIs.
>
> To that end, the bundled -httpd and -nntpd servers are designed
> to handle aggressive clients fairly even if they simultaneously
> download huge amounts of messages.
>
> Thanks for the interest.

Thanks for your work!

Nicolás

  reply index

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-11  9:17 Nicolás Ojeda Bär
2018-03-14  7:13 ` Eric Wong
2018-03-14 10:03   ` Nicolás Ojeda Bär [this message]
2019-06-15 20:37     ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPunWhD85aNDEg1Uk_fc1-a9zP+_C431y0YHD0MUHq4JVvV22w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=n.oje.bar@gmail.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/meta
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/meta
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/meta
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/meta

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.mail.public-inbox.meta
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.mail.public-inbox.meta
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.mail.public-inbox.meta
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.mail.public-inbox.meta
	nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.mail.public-inbox.general

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git