From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Place ENTRY_POINT in .text.unlikely section [BZ #28153]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:36:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8aiv3sl.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210731151316.1659316-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> (H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha's message of "Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:13:16 -0700")
* H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha:
> diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S b/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S
> index 417da8802b..e46e01ed0b 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S
> +++ b/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> NULL
> */
>
> - .text
> + .section .text.unlikely,"ax",%progbits
> ENTRY(_start)
> /* Create an initial frame with 0 LR and FP */
> cfi_undefined (x30)
I don't think it's correct to place code that runs during every process
start into .text.unlikely. Surely we can avoid that page fault.
Can we fix the ENTRY_POINT assumption in profiling instead?
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-31 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-31 15:13 [PATCH v2] Place ENTRY_POINT in .text.unlikely section [BZ #28153] H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-31 16:36 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-07-31 17:06 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-31 17:09 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-31 17:11 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-07-31 17:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v3] Use __executable_start as the lowest address for profiling " H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8aiv3sl.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).