From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187A91F8C6 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8706A3857429 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:36:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8706A3857429 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1627749412; bh=K5KZpVpjyKURVEaGawCE+Mn9NPi6AJYojUhk/r/9JcM=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=TFZkXBwwrzlnGDD+CpEItJhGV/2dj1gDBhwldG5j/KS8gRmRt7TRixswUTlUOd0Hs vdmasiRIjo9v7Ry33al/mwWpaz20Pw18mJ2tmKeXGsk2XjeLzUUnK9Dho7osLYCoMc egrgtj5v1aRwFqsmacdWyDJRHhXmFjTcCiPQeBIU= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D465A3858D3C for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:36:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D465A3858D3C Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-247-pbJJyarlOwq1xlBULbBlfg-1; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:36:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pbJJyarlOwq1xlBULbBlfg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24851835AC3; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC0B5D9F0; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:36:28 +0000 (UTC) To: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Place ENTRY_POINT in .text.unlikely section [BZ #28153] References: <20210731151316.1659316-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:36:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210731151316.1659316-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> (H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha's message of "Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:13:16 -0700") Message-ID: <87o8aiv3sl.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Florian Weimer Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" * H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha: > diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S b/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S > index 417da8802b..e46e01ed0b 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S > +++ b/sysdeps/aarch64/start.S > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ > NULL > */ > > - .text > + .section .text.unlikely,"ax",%progbits > ENTRY(_start) > /* Create an initial frame with 0 LR and FP */ > cfi_undefined (x30) I don't think it's correct to place code that runs during every process start into .text.unlikely. Surely we can avoid that page fault. Can we fix the ENTRY_POINT assumption in profiling instead? Thanks, Florian