unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: "Seija K." <doremylover123@gmail.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Add restrict annotations to all functions that require it
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 13:30:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86b3224b-84d4-ed5f-4699-de89b25cc66a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA42iKx9UWADYaMRGTVrnR==P8yTQzOWLV3TY65QEWLW9v-ehQ@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2843 bytes --]

[CC += all CCs from man-pages patches]

Hi Seija,

On 11/27/22 01:56, Seija K. via Libc-alpha wrote:
> The format value has to be a string literal, every time. Otherwise, you are
> not using these functions correctly. To reinforce this fact, I put
> __restrict over every example of this I could find.


I like this change.  In fact, when I added 'restrict' to the Linux man-pages, I 
had to check that in some cases POSIX and glibc matched, but in others, either 
glibc or POSIX had restrict while the other didn't:

Linux man-pages commits:

-  746d60af802a4462055c4f87a62681f7254325d8 [strptime(3)]
    -  You fixed this one in the patch; fine.
-  0864c240797e3b793a88ee6be5710dd9a8df9b45 [posix_spawnp(3)]
    -  This one hasn't been changed in you patch; please check.
    -  Bug reported here: <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27529>
    -  See some proof below.
-  c445280cf371cda66916c4e5e0fdb168db3a5ad6 [lio_listio(3)]
    -  This one hasn't been changed in you patch; please check.
    -  Bug reported here: <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16747>
    -  See some proof below.

I might have missed other cases by accident, but I think those 3 are all the 
cases where POSIX uses restrict and glibc doesn't (there are many more cases of 
the opposite, but that's OK for your patch), as far as I documented back then 
when I added restrict to the man-pages.

Cheers,

Alex

P.S.: I'm neutral to having the 'restrict' keyword in function definitions, if 
they are already in function prototypes (Mike reported this).

--- posix_spawnp(3):

$ man 3p posix_spawnp |sed -n '/^SYNOPSIS/,/;/p'
SYNOPSIS
        #include <spawn.h>

        int posix_spawnp(pid_t *restrict pid, const char *restrict file,
            const posix_spawn_file_actions_t *file_actions,
            const posix_spawnattr_t *restrict attrp,
            char *const argv[restrict], char *const envp[restrict]);
$ grepc posix_spawnp /usr/include
/usr/include/spawn.h:85:
extern int posix_spawnp (pid_t *__pid, const char *__file,
			 const posix_spawn_file_actions_t *__file_actions,
			 const posix_spawnattr_t *__attrp,
			 char *const __argv[], char *const __envp[])
     __nonnull ((2, 5));

--- lio_listio(3):

$ man 3p lio_listio |sed -n '/^SYNOPSIS/,/;/p'
SYNOPSIS
        #include <aio.h>

        int lio_listio(int mode, struct aiocb *restrict const list[restrict],
            int nent, struct sigevent *restrict sig);
$ grepc lio_listio /usr/include
/usr/include/aio.h:148:
extern int lio_listio (int __mode,
		       struct aiocb *const __list[__restrict_arr],
		       int __nent, struct sigevent *__restrict __sig)
   __THROW __nonnull ((2));


/usr/include/aio.h:214:
#  define lio_listio lio_listio64
-- 
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-27 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-27  0:56 Add restrict annotations to all functions that require it Seija K. via Libc-alpha
2022-11-27 11:44 ` Mike Frysinger via Libc-alpha
2022-11-27 12:00   ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
2022-12-03 14:32     ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
2022-12-06 23:57       ` Joseph Myers
2022-12-07 11:59         ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
2022-12-07 19:05           ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-27 12:04 ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
2022-11-27 12:30 ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha [this message]
2022-11-27 12:39   ` Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
2022-11-28 21:17 ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86b3224b-84d4-ed5f-4699-de89b25cc66a@gmail.com \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=doremylover123@gmail.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).