unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: New math test failures on Fedora/33
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:28:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0af99b-8353-7201-ec79-aae1b8eada70@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqtJNEDp5wX4Wn5htrxm6cUa0y+9ZUcooeMoLEHPSP=+g@mail.gmail.com>



On 11/01/2021 13:00, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Fedora 33, I got these new math test failures:
> 
> FAIL: math/test-double-cosh
> FAIL: math/test-float32x-cosh
> FAIL: math/test-float64-cosh
> 
> for i686 glibc like
> 
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c5d374p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c5d37700c6bb2p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c5d37700c6bbp+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c5d378p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c679d1f73f0fcp+8): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0x2.c679d4p+8): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0xf.ffffffffffff8p+1020): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (-0xf.fffffp+124): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c5d374p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c5d37700c6bb2p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c5d37700c6bbp+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c5d378p+12): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c679d1f73f0fcp+8): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0x2.c679d4p+8): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0xf.ffffffffffff8p+1020): Exception "Overflow" not set
> Failure: cosh_upward (0xf.fffffp+124): Exception "Overflow" not set

This is a regression of BZ#18980 caused by 9e97f239eae1f2b1.  The original
issue was fixed by c8235dda728c445, but the patch did not add the fix for
wordsize64 version because it does not require back then (since it seems
to happen on 32-bit, at least I am seeing on i686).

This seems to fix it:

diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_cosh.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_cosh.c
index 4f41ca2c92..81de5ae6bd 100644
--- a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_cosh.c
+++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_cosh.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 
 #include <math.h>
 #include <math_private.h>
+#include <math-narrow-eval.h>
 #include <libm-alias-finite.h>
 
 static const double one = 1.0, half=0.5, huge = 1.0e300;
@@ -80,6 +81,6 @@ __ieee754_cosh (double x)
        if(ix>=0x7ff00000) return x*x;
 
     /* |x| > overflowthresold, cosh(x) overflow */
-       return huge*huge;
+       return math_narrow_eval (huge * huge);
 }
 libm_alias_finite (__ieee754_cosh, __cosh)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 16:00 New math test failures on Fedora/33 H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-11 16:28 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-01-11 18:37   ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-11 19:21     ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-12  7:13       ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-01-12 17:29         ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-12 17:39           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-01-12 19:14           ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho via Libc-alpha
2021-01-13  6:34             ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-01-13 12:51               ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-14 12:48                 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-14 12:59             ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-14 13:19               ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-01-14 14:47                 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-14 13:07 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-18 14:22 Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 14:36 ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-01-18 14:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-01-18 15:18   ` Paul Zimmermann
2021-01-18 17:03     ` Andreas Schwab
2021-01-18 15:20   ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 15:30     ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 15:38       ` Andreas Schwab
2021-01-18 16:58 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 15:59 ` Patrick McGehearty via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b0af99b-8353-7201-ec79-aae1b8eada70@linaro.org \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).