From: Samuel Thibault via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io: Refactor close_range and closefrom
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:17:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124121741.qcrchlkne6c3ystm@begin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtltoj5k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Florian Weimer, le mer. 24 nov. 2021 13:03:19 +0100, a ecrit:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>
> >> diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/kernel-features.h b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/kernel-features.h
> >> index 7d4eaee0a6..5fd37a6d7b 100644
> >> --- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/kernel-features.h
> >> +++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/kernel-features.h
> >> @@ -19,3 +19,5 @@
> >> /* This file can define __ASSUME_* macros checked by certain source files.
> >> Almost none of these are used outside of sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux code.
> >> But those referring to POSIX-level features like O_* flags can be. */
> >> +
> >> +#define __ASSUME_CLOSE_RANGE 1
> >
> > It does add it here (I also checked with a build for i688-gnu).
>
> Hmm, this doesn't match existing practice. We haven't unified
> implementations in light of such divergence, I think. If the Hurd
> developers don't object, it should be fine, though..
I'm fine with it yes. This is not a "kernel-feature" since it's actually
implemented inside glibc itself, but from the point of view of the rest
of the world that's how people understand it, so better adhere to it :)
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-08 17:28 [PATCH v2] io: Refactor close_range and closefrom Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-11-23 18:29 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-11-24 9:52 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-11-24 11:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-11-24 12:03 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-11-24 12:17 ` Samuel Thibault via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-11-24 12:20 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-11-24 12:43 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211124121741.qcrchlkne6c3ystm@begin \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=bugaevc@gmail.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).