unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] Remove __morecore and __default_morecore
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:31:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210714183123.GB16858@bender.morinfr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4437c35-3d96-79c3-c960-5f4bbf82807f@redhat.com>

On 14 Jul 13:15, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> On 7/14/21 12:42 PM, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> > That said, I was personally aware since it was pointed out on a
> > libhugetlbfs github issue that it was deprecated in 2.32. I think the
> > hope was it would be replaced by something usable, and users would not
> > be left with *no* solution (I was also quietly hoping Eric Munson, the
> > libhugetlbfs maintainer would be reaching out). But if you remove it, I
> > am not quite sure what you expect libhugetlbfs users to do, really.
> 
> Please work with upstream libhugetlbfs to prioritize issue #52.
> 
> Deprecation of morecore in glibc #52 (2020-08-27):
> https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/issues/52

I wrote quite a few extensive emails in this thread about how there are
no good, maintainbable solution for libhugetlbfs that I can see. If
there was, I would have written a patch already instead of arguing over
email :-) 

I do get your frustation here and libhugetlbfs users/debs should have
reached out earlier. But I cannot do much about that now. I am trying to
find a workable compromise here, that's all.
 
-- 
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-13  7:38 [PATCH v8 00/10] malloc hooks removal Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] Make mcheck tests conditional on GLIBC_2.24 or earlier Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:03   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] Remove __after_morecore_hook Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:03   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] Remove __morecore and __default_morecore Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-14  7:01   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-14 12:54     ` Guillaume Morin
2021-07-14 14:13       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-14 16:42         ` Guillaume Morin
2021-07-14 17:15           ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-14 17:42             ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-07-14 18:37               ` Guillaume Morin
2021-07-14 18:48               ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-14 18:31             ` Guillaume Morin [this message]
2021-07-14 17:32           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-14 18:25             ` Guillaume Morin
2021-07-14 18:43               ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-14 18:51                 ` Guillaume Morin
2021-07-17 22:03   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] Move malloc hooks into a compat DSO Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] mcheck: Wean away from malloc hooks Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 15:47   ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-14  2:44     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] Simplify __malloc_initialized Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] mtrace: Wean away from malloc hooks Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] glibc.malloc.check: " Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] Remove " Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] mcheck Fix malloc_usable_size [BZ #22057] Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:04   ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 14:48 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] malloc hooks removal H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 15:41   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha
2021-07-17 22:03 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210714183123.GB16858@bender.morinfr.org \
    --to=guillaume@morinfr.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).