From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A08821F8C6 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA8039874E8 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:31:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4051B38515D6; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:31:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4051B38515D6 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=morinfr.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=morinfr.org Received: from bender.morinfr.org (unknown [82.64.86.27]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB3F19F58A; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:31:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=morinfr.org ; s=20170427; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kr4/oUBDsSyRx/qVYoFn6fgTru/gvUKR9IBPRDTGxBw=; b=M39ingw+Sa81MCFEelBmbOtSB6 3zc6AN7XqwnlEciXLHDyKnCRqgt1cGImQaS+gExlc8S2ELh94RT2Ppp47nbvIjwmuI/7uIBiL9fA9 A6xtwNZoT3L6tP26+whQWSPmIn9xvyljvwwZ29EDgUeHXCYgaxz+1My5y6kaCvmgVAGM=; Received: from guillaum by bender.morinfr.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3jfI-0005SC-5I; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:31:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:31:24 +0200 From: Guillaume Morin To: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] Remove __morecore and __default_morecore Message-ID: <20210714183123.GB16858@bender.morinfr.org> References: <20210713073845.504356-1-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <20210713073845.504356-4-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <9925362a-d278-a0ad-f504-ae08ca93f628@gotplt.org> <20210714125415.GA24678@bender.morinfr.org> <45ba79b4-02e6-fae5-ae9b-db6c8a01aecb@gotplt.org> <20210714164204.GA1103@bender.morinfr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, Guillaume Morin , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 14 Jul 13:15, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 7/14/21 12:42 PM, Guillaume Morin wrote: > > That said, I was personally aware since it was pointed out on a > > libhugetlbfs github issue that it was deprecated in 2.32. I think the > > hope was it would be replaced by something usable, and users would not > > be left with *no* solution (I was also quietly hoping Eric Munson, the > > libhugetlbfs maintainer would be reaching out). But if you remove it, I > > am not quite sure what you expect libhugetlbfs users to do, really. > > Please work with upstream libhugetlbfs to prioritize issue #52. > > Deprecation of morecore in glibc #52 (2020-08-27): > https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/issues/52 I wrote quite a few extensive emails in this thread about how there are no good, maintainbable solution for libhugetlbfs that I can see. If there was, I would have written a patch already instead of arguing over email :-) I do get your frustation here and libhugetlbfs users/debs should have reached out earlier. But I cannot do much about that now. I am trying to find a workable compromise here, that's all. -- Guillaume Morin