git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/helper/test-chmtime: update mingw to support chmtime on directories
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:00:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfso2zm6l.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76b6216281e3463821e650495f3090c677905f73.1646041236.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:40:35 +0000")

"Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz>
>
> The mingw_utime implementation in mingw.c does not support
> directories. This means that "test-tool chmtime" fails on Windows when
> targeting directories. This has previously been noted and sidestepped
> by Jeff Hostetler, in "t/helper/test-chmtime: skip directories
> on Windows" in the "Builtin FSMonitor Part 2" work.

I was expecting that this will be applicable _before_ FSMonitor Part
2 and later.  This mention would probably belong to the comment
after three-dashes?

> It would make sense to backdate file and folder changes in untracked
> cache tests, to avoid needing to insert explicit delays/pauses in the
> tests.
>
> Add support for directory date manipulation in mingw_utime by calling
> CreateFileW() explicitly to create the directory handle, and
> CloseHandle() to close it.

OK.

> @@ -964,6 +964,8 @@ int mingw_utime (const char *file_name, const struct utimbuf *times)
>  	int fh, rc;
>  	DWORD attrs;
>  	wchar_t wfilename[MAX_PATH];
> +	HANDLE osfilehandle;

The variable is not initialized here, but that is perfectly OK.
We'll set it in both branches for directories and files.

>  	if (xutftowcs_path(wfilename, file_name) < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
> @@ -975,9 +977,26 @@ int mingw_utime (const char *file_name, const struct utimbuf *times)
>  		SetFileAttributesW(wfilename, attrs & ~FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY);
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((fh = _wopen(wfilename, O_RDWR | O_BINARY)) < 0) {
> -		rc = -1;
> -		goto revert_attrs;
> +	if (attrs & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY) {

Excellent.  We can reuse existing attrs without any extra calls to
introduce the new codepath to deal with directories.

> +		fh = 0;

This should be

		fh = -1;

instead.  More on this later.

> +		osfilehandle = CreateFileW(wfilename,
> +					   0x100 /*FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES*/,
> +					   0 /*FileShare.None*/,
> +					   NULL,
> +					   OPEN_EXISTING,
> +					   FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS,
> +					   NULL);
> +		if (osfilehandle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
> +			errno = err_win_to_posix(GetLastError());
> +			rc = -1;
> +			goto revert_attrs;
> +		}

Upon an error, we'll jump to revert_attrs but otherwise, we will
have a valid osfilehandle (which presumably is not NULL).

> +	} else {
> +		if ((fh = _wopen(wfilename, O_RDWR | O_BINARY)) < 0) {
> +			rc = -1;
> +			goto revert_attrs;
> +		}
> +		osfilehandle = (HANDLE)_get_osfhandle(fh);

This side is the same as before.  This code assumes that, as long as
_wopen() gives us a usable fh, _get_osfhandle(fh) would always give
us a valid handle.  This assumption should be safe, as the original
code has been relying on it anyway.

> @@ -987,12 +1006,16 @@ int mingw_utime (const char *file_name, const struct utimbuf *times)
>  		GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(&mft);
>  		aft = mft;
>  	}
> -	if (!SetFileTime((HANDLE)_get_osfhandle(fh), NULL, &aft, &mft)) {
> +	if (!SetFileTime(osfilehandle, NULL, &aft, &mft)) {

And we use the osfilehandle we obtained, either from the code that
is identical to the original for files or from the new code for
directories.  Good.

>  		errno = EINVAL;
>  		rc = -1;
>  	} else
>  		rc = 0;
> -	close(fh);
> +
> +	if (fh)
> +		close(fh);
> +	else if (osfilehandle)
> +		CloseHandle(osfilehandle);

In the context of "git" process, I do not think we would ever close
FD#0, so it may be safe to assume that _wopen() above will never
yield FD#0, so this is not quite wrong per-se, but to be
future-proof, it would be even safer to instead do:

	if (0 <= fh)
		close(fh);
	else if (osfilehandle)
		CloseHandle(osfilehandle);

here.  That is consistent with the error checking done where
_wopen() was called to obtain it above, i.e.

	if ((fh = _wopen(...)) < 0)
		... error ...

>  revert_attrs:
>  	if (attrs != INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES &&

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-28 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28  9:40 [PATCH 0/2] Reduce explicit sleep calls in t7063 untracked cache tests Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-02-28  9:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/helper/test-chmtime: update mingw to support chmtime on directories Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-02-28 15:27   ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-02-28 22:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01  8:16     ` Tao Klerks
2022-02-28 22:00   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-03-01  8:21     ` Tao Klerks
2022-02-28  9:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] t7063: mtime-mangling instead of delays in untracked cache testing Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-02-28 22:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01  9:44     ` Tao Klerks
2022-02-28 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] Reduce explicit sleep calls in t7063 untracked cache tests Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-28 15:29 ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 " Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01  9:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t/helper/test-chmtime: update mingw to support chmtime on directories Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 16:34     ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-03-01 21:14       ` Tao Klerks
2022-03-01  9:45   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] t7063: mtime-mangling instead of delays in untracked cache testing Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-01 18:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 22:13       ` Tao Klerks
2022-03-01  9:49   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Reduce explicit sleep calls in t7063 untracked cache tests Tao Klerks
2022-03-01 17:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-02  6:05   ` [PATCH v3 " Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-02  6:05     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t/helper/test-chmtime: update mingw to support chmtime on directories Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 21:46       ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-02  6:05     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] t7063: mtime-mangling instead of delays in untracked cache testing Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 21:53       ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-05  4:24     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Reduce explicit sleep calls in t7063 untracked cache tests Tao Klerks
2022-03-06 21:57       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07  5:37         ` Tao Klerks
2022-03-07 18:15           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfso2zm6l.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=tao@klerks.biz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).