git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Clarify interaction between signed pushes and push options
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 14:44:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa86n9a3d.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1494027001.git.jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Fri, 5 May 2017 16:46:41 -0700")

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:

> We noticed this when trying to use Git to make a signed push with push
> options to a server using JGit (which rejects such pushes because the
> Git client makes requests that are, strictly speaking, incompatible with
> the documented protocol).
>
> There have been several commits (see the commits linked in the commit
> messages of the patches sent in reply to this e-mail) to support push
> options (that are read by receive hooks) when using "git push", but the
> interaction between push options and signed pushes are not very clear.
> Here are some patches (containing both code and documentation) that
> clarify this interaction.
>
> I would appreciate a review of this - if we could make the protocol
> clear, we could then update JGit to use the updated protocol and be no
> longer incompatible with existing Git clients.

I've seen the exchanges on list on these three patches, and I agree
with what Jonathan said.

These are going in the right direction in general but a few nits
need to be picked before becoming ready for 'next'.

Thanks.

>
> Jonathan Tan (3):
>   docs: correct receive.advertisePushOptions default
>   receive-pack: verify push options in cert
>   protocol docs: explain receive-pack push options
>
>  Documentation/config.txt                  |  5 ++--
>  Documentation/git-receive-pack.txt        | 10 +++++++
>  Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++----
>  builtin/receive-pack.c                    | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  t/t5534-push-signed.sh                    | 15 ++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-08  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-05 23:46 [PATCH 0/3] Clarify interaction between signed pushes and push options Jonathan Tan
2017-05-05 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] docs: correct receive.advertisePushOptions default Jonathan Tan
2017-05-05 23:50   ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-05 23:53     ` Stefan Beller
2017-05-05 23:58   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-05 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] receive-pack: verify push options in cert Jonathan Tan
2017-05-06  0:02   ` Stefan Beller
2017-05-06  0:06     ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-06  0:20     ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-06  0:10   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-05 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] protocol docs: explain receive-pack push options Jonathan Tan
2017-05-06  0:10   ` Stefan Beller
2017-05-06  0:26   ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-08 21:27     ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-08  5:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-05-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Clarify interaction between signed pushes and " Jonathan Tan
2017-05-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: correct receive.advertisePushOptions default Jonathan Tan
2017-05-08 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] receive-pack: verify push options in cert Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09  3:15   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-09  3:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-09 16:45     ` [PATCH] fixup! use perl instead of sed Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 17:00       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-05-09 19:23         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Clarify interaction between signed pushes and push options Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 21:01           ` [PATCH v3] fixup! don't use perl -i because it's not portable Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 19:23         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] docs: correct receive.advertisePushOptions default Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 19:23         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] receive-pack: verify push options in cert Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 20:43         ` [PATCH] fixup! use perl instead of sed Johannes Sixt
2017-05-09 21:04           ` Jonathan Tan
2017-05-09 21:08           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-05-09 22:38         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-09 23:44           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqa86n9a3d.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).