git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Haggerty" <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	me@ttaylorr.com, peff@peff.net, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
	"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Speed up remove_redundant()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:25:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8s7lc61j.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a1a8990-59e7-d538-d382-446fdc270810@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:48:02 -0500")

Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2/1/2021 7:47 AM, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> My tests were on the Linux kernel repository, testing this command:
>> 
>>   git merge-base --independent $(git for-each-ref refs/tags --format="%(refname)")
>> 
>>        Before: 16.4s
>> After Patch 1:  1.1s
>> After Patch 2:  0.1s
>
> During my testing of v2, I discovered how remove_redundant()
> is being used as part of 'git log --simplify-merges'. So, here
> are some performance numbers for the Linux kernel repository
> with a full commit-graph and changed-path Bloom filters running
>
>   git log --oneline -n10 --simplify-merges -- kernel/
>
> Benchmark #1: old
>   Time (mean ± σ):      5.770 s ±  0.030 s    [User: 5.551 s, System: 0.219 s]
>   Range (min … max):    5.728 s …  5.827 s    10 runs
>  
> Benchmark #2: new
>   Time (mean ± σ):      5.030 s ±  0.017 s    [User: 4.805 s, System: 0.224 s]
>   Range (min … max):    4.999 s …  5.054 s    10 runs
>  
> Summary
>   'new' ran
>     1.15 ± 0.01 times faster than 'old'


This topic seems to have been forgotten?  Is the only thing missing
is an updated 2/5 or is there anything more that is needed?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] Speed up remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 20:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-29 17:11     ` René Scharfe
2021-01-31  3:52       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 10:20         ` René Scharfe
2021-01-31  3:59     ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 20:13       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 20:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01  3:55         ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-29 17:10   ` René Scharfe
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] Speed up remove_redundant() Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 12:47   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] commit-reach: reduce requirements for remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 19:51     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 12:47   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 16:12     ` René Scharfe.
2021-02-01 16:31       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 12:47   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 12:47   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 20:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 21:02       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 12:47   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] commit-reach: stale commits may prune generation further Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-03 15:59     ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-01 15:48   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Speed up remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee
2021-02-18 23:25     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-02-19 12:17       ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-20  3:32         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 12:34   ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] commit-reach: reduce requirements for remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] commit-reach: stale commits may prune generation further Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8s7lc61j.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).