From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael Haggerty" <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
me@ttaylorr.com, peff@peff.net, gitster@pobox.com,
"René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Speed up remove_redundant()
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:48:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1a8990-59e7-d538-d382-446fdc270810@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.852.v2.git.1612183647.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On 2/1/2021 7:47 AM, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> My tests were on the Linux kernel repository, testing this command:
>
> git merge-base --independent $(git for-each-ref refs/tags --format="%(refname)")
>
> Before: 16.4s
> After Patch 1: 1.1s
> After Patch 2: 0.1s
During my testing of v2, I discovered how remove_redundant()
is being used as part of 'git log --simplify-merges'. So, here
are some performance numbers for the Linux kernel repository
with a full commit-graph and changed-path Bloom filters running
git log --oneline -n10 --simplify-merges -- kernel/
Benchmark #1: old
Time (mean ± σ): 5.770 s ± 0.030 s [User: 5.551 s, System: 0.219 s]
Range (min … max): 5.728 s … 5.827 s 10 runs
Benchmark #2: new
Time (mean ± σ): 5.030 s ± 0.017 s [User: 4.805 s, System: 0.224 s]
Range (min … max): 4.999 s … 5.054 s 10 runs
Summary
'new' ran
1.15 ± 0.01 times faster than 'old'
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 16:24 [PATCH 0/3] Speed up remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-29 17:11 ` René Scharfe
2021-01-31 3:52 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 10:20 ` René Scharfe
2021-01-31 3:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 20:13 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-31 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 3:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-01-29 17:10 ` René Scharfe
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-01-28 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] Speed up remove_redundant() Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] commit-reach: reduce requirements for remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 16:12 ` René Scharfe.
2021-02-01 16:31 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-01 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-01 21:02 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] commit-reach: stale commits may prune generation further Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-03 15:59 ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-01 15:48 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2021-02-18 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Speed up remove_redundant() Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 12:17 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-02-20 3:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] commit-reach: reduce requirements for remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] commit-reach: use one walk in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] commit-reach: move compare_commits_by_gen Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] commit-reach: use heuristic in remove_redundant() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] commit-reach: stale commits may prune generation further Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a1a8990-59e7-d538-d382-446fdc270810@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).