From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
To: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com>
Cc: pclouds@gmail.com, iveqy@iveqy.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Build in git-repack
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 16:28:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqzjsth8wt.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375884049-14961-2-git-send-email-stefanbeller@googlemail.com> (Stefan Beller's message of "Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:00:46 +0200")
[ It's cool you're working on this, I'd really like a git-repack in C.
That would fix this
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226458 ]
Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> writes:
> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>
> pack-objects learns a few more options to take over what's been done
> by git-repack.sh. cmd_repack() becomes a wrapper around
> cmd_pack_objects().
I think the patch would read easier if these were split into two
patches: one doing the real stuff in pack-objects, and then getting rid
of git-repack.sh to replace it with a trivial built-in.
Actually, I'm wondering why pack-objects requires so much changes.
git-repack.sh was already a relatively small wrapper around
pack-objects, and did not need the new options you add, so why are they
needed? In particular adding the new --update-info option that just does
> + if (repack_flags & REPACK_UPDATE_INFO)
> + update_server_info(0);
seems overkill to me: why don't you just let cmd_repack call
update_server_info(0)?
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-02 13:48 Rewriting git-repack.sh in C Stefan Beller
2013-08-02 14:10 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-02 16:36 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-03 6:33 ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2013-08-03 10:03 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Stefan Beller
2013-08-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] Build in git-repack Stefan Beller
2013-08-07 14:28 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2013-08-07 15:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-07 16:45 ` Stefan Beller
2013-08-08 2:44 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] backup_file dummy function Stefan Beller
2013-08-08 2:45 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-08-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] pack-objects: do not print usage when repacking Stefan Beller
2013-08-08 6:40 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-08-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] repack: add unpack-unreachable Stefan Beller
2013-08-05 10:34 ` Rewriting git-repack.sh in C Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vpqzjsth8wt.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
--to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iveqy@iveqy.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanbeller@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).