git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk,
	"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Slavica Đukić" <slawica92@hotmail.com>,
	"Denton Liu" <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add -i: default to the built-in implementation
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:59:11 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2112102356150.90@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5ys7vt8t.fsf@gitster.g>

Hi Junio,

On Thu, 2 Dec 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> >> > +	if (use_builtin_add_i < 0 &&
> >> > +	    git_config_get_bool("add.interactive.usebuiltin",
> >> > +				&use_builtin_add_i))
> >> > +		use_builtin_add_i = 1;
> >> >   -	if (use_builtin_add_i == 1) {
> >> > +	if (use_builtin_add_i != 0) {
> >>
> >> This could be simplified to "if (use_builtin_add_i)" but don't re-roll just
> >> for that
> >
> > I was actually considering this, given that Git's coding practice suggests
> > precisely the form you suggested.
> >
> > However, in this instance I found that form misleading: it would read to
> > me as if `use_builtin_add_i` was a Boolean. But it is a tristate, it can
> > also be `-1` ("undecided"). And I wanted to express "if this is not set to
> > `false` specifically", therefore I ended up with my proposal.
>
> I do not think that line of logic is sensible.  The variable starts
> its life as a tristate (i.e. not just bool but can be unknown), and
> the four new lines above the conditional the patch adds is exactly
> about getting rid of the unknown-ness and turning it into a known
> boolean.  After that happens, the variable can safely be used as a
> boolean.  In fact, I view the four lines before it is exactly to
> allow us to do so.
>
> Writing "if not zero" implies that the variable can have a non-zero
> value that is still "unknown" at this point in the code that has to
> be defaulted to "true", which would mean that the "if unset, read
> the config, and if that fails, default to true" logic above is not
> doing its job.  That is a false impression that misleads readers of
> the code.
>
> So, I would say this conditional just should treat the variable as a
> simple boolean.

That forces the reader to perform those mental gymnastics to follow the
reasoning that the tristate now essentially became a Boolean.

I wanted to avoid that unnecessary cognitive load.

Ciao,
Dscho

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-10 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-30 14:14 [PATCH 0/2] Use the built-in implementation of the interactive add command by default Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-11-30 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] t2016: require the PERL prereq only when necessary Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-12-01 22:25   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-02 14:57     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-11-30 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] add -i: default to the built-in implementation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-12-01 11:20   ` Phillip Wood
2021-12-02 15:01     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-12-02 16:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-02 17:43         ` Ramsay Jones
2021-12-10 22:59         ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2021-12-01 13:37   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-01 22:41     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-01 22:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-02 17:30     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-12-09  4:12   ` [PATCH] fixup! " Junio C Hamano
2021-12-10 22:55     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-11-30 20:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] Use the built-in implementation of the interactive add command by default Jeff King
2021-11-30 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-01 13:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-01 21:24 ` Carlo Arenas
2021-12-02 17:33   ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-12-03 13:58 ` Philippe Blain
2021-12-06 15:59   ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2112102356150.90@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=slawica92@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).