From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] t5509: initialized `pushee` as bare repository
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:59:06 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2002141252050.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsgjeqm6w.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > From: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
> >
> > `receive.denyCurrentBranch` currently has a bug where it allows pushing
> > into the current branch of a non-bare repository as long as it does not
> > have any commits.
>
> Can patch 3/3 be split into two,
I actually don't think so. The `refs_resolve_unsafe()` function simply
requires a tip commit, so it is the wrong function to call in this
context. And the fix for it is to use a more appropriate function, which
3/3 already does (although for an unrelated reason).
In other words, a fix for one bug would be a fix for the other, and
(probably) vice versa.
> so that the fix would protect an already populated branch that is
> checked out anywhere (not in the primary worktree--which is the bug you
> are fixing) from getting updated but still allow an unborn branch to be
> updated, and then have patch 4/3 that forbids an update to even an
> unborn branch "checked out" in any working tree? This update to the
> test can then become part of patch 4/3.
I agree that this merits a regression test.
Thanks,
Dscho
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 18:59 [PATCH 0/3] [GSoC] receive.denyCurrentBranch: respect all worktrees Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-13 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] get_main_worktree(): allow it to be called in the Git directory Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-13 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] t5509: initialized `pushee` as bare repository Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-13 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-13 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-14 11:59 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2020-02-14 15:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-15 21:52 ` Hariom verma
2020-02-16 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-22 22:54 ` Hariom verma
2020-02-13 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] receive.denyCurrentBranch: respect all worktrees Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] [GSoC] " Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] get_main_worktree(): allow it to be called in the Git directory Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t5509: initialized `pushee` as bare repository Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-23 6:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] bug: denyCurrentBranch and unborn branch with ref namespace Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-23 6:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] receive.denyCurrentBranch: respect all worktrees Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-23 6:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-23 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] [GSoC] " Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-23 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] get_main_worktree(): allow it to be called in the Git directory Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-24 1:42 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-02-24 11:09 ` Hariom verma
2020-02-24 17:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-02-24 18:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-02-24 22:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-02-27 15:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-02-24 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-23 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] t5509: use a bare repository for test push target Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2020-02-23 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] receive.denyCurrentBranch: respect all worktrees Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2002141252050.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).