git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Correctly detecting modified paths in merge commits?
@ 2010-12-16 16:54 Dun Peal
  2010-12-16 18:33 ` Jakub Narebski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dun Peal @ 2010-12-16 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Git ML

Hi.

We wrote a post-receive hook that alerts users (via email) when
specific paths are modified by their peers. The implementation is
pretty simple: whenever a new commit is made, we ask git for the full
list of files modified by that commit:

  git diff --name-only <COMMIT HASH>^!

This works well for regular commits, but breaks for merge commits.

For example, suppose we have the following basic merge scenario:

  B
 / \
A   D
 \ /
  C

Root A was branched to B and C, then merged into commit D.

Problem is, the diff for D^! will include all the changes introduced by C.

One obvious solution is to simply ignore merge commits, by parsing
`git cat-file commit D` and discarding all commits with parent count >
1. But merge commits may actually contain legitimate modified files if
there were any conflict resolutions.

So what's the best solution for this problem, oh wise Git wizards?

Thanks, D.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Correctly detecting modified paths in merge commits?
  2010-12-16 16:54 Correctly detecting modified paths in merge commits? Dun Peal
@ 2010-12-16 18:33 ` Jakub Narebski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Narebski @ 2010-12-16 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dun Peal; +Cc: Git ML

Dun Peal <dunpealer@gmail.com> writes:

> We wrote a post-receive hook that alerts users (via email) when
> specific paths are modified by their peers. The implementation is
> pretty simple: whenever a new commit is made, we ask git for the full
> list of files modified by that commit:
> 
>   git diff --name-only <COMMIT HASH>^!
> 
> This works well for regular commits, but breaks for merge commits.

Note that <commit>^! is *range* specifier, and 'git diff' really takes
two *endpoints*.  

>From git-diff(1) manpage.

    For a more complete list of ways to spell <commit>, see  "SPECIFYING
    REVISIONS" section in gitrevisions(1). However, "diff" is about 
    comparing two _endpoints_, not ranges, and the range notations  
    ("<commit>..<commit>"  and  "<commit>...<commit>")  do not mean a
    range as defined in the "SPECIFYING RANGES" section in gitrevisions(1).

<commit>^1 means include given commit but exclude all of its parents
(see gitrevisions(7)).

For a merge commit r1^! means r1 ^p1 ^p2 (where p1 and p2 are parents
of r1), which for git-diff probably means "git diff p1 r1".
  
 
> For example, suppose we have the following basic merge scenario:
> 
>   B
>  / \
> A   D
>  \ /
>   C
> 
> Root A was branched to B and C, then merged into commit D.
> 
> Problem is, the diff for D^! will include all the changes introduced by C.

See above.

Try 

  $ git diff-tree --name-only -c <COMMIT HADH>

instead.  '-c' is to show merge commit as combined diff (noting changes
different from both parents).  I'm not sure if this is what you want.

There is alwats '--cc' or '-m' instead of '-c'.
 
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-16 18:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-16 16:54 Correctly detecting modified paths in merge commits? Dun Peal
2010-12-16 18:33 ` Jakub Narebski

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).