git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)]
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:58:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff5003c369c5247ad1a0b3a51d1581db@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa628eba-1545-47ac-9773-8aff47ca4adf@gmail.com>

Hello Phillip,

On 2024-04-24 12:16, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 23/04/2024 18:52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> In the previous step, the "--rfc" option of "format-patch" learned
>> to take an optional string value to prepend to the subject prefix,
>> so that --rfc=WIP can give "[WIP PATCH]".
>> 
>> There may be cases in which the extra string wants to come after the
>> subject prefix.  Extend the mechanism to allow "--rfc=-(WIP)" [*] to
>> signal that the extra string is to be appended instead of getting
>> prepended, resulting in "[PATCH (WIP)]".
>> 
>> In the documentation, discourage (ab)using "--rfc=-RFC" to say
>> "[PATCH RFC]" just to be different, when "[RFC PATCH]" is the norm.
>> 
>> [Footnote]
>> 
>>   * The syntax takes inspiration from Perl's open syntax that opens
>>     pipes "open fh, '|-', 'cmd'", where the dash signals "the other
>>     stuff comes here".
> 
> I'm not convinced this is a good idea as I'm not sure how adding "RFC"
> at the end of the subject prefix makes the world better than just
> having at the start of the prefix and I find using "-" to do that
> quite confusing.

Please, read my earlier responses [1][2] to see why does this
feature actually make the world a bit better.  To sum it up, just
as there's bit rot, there's also English grammar rot, which we
shouldn't embrace or promote.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/git/f9aae9692493e4b722ce9f38de73c810@manjaro.org/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/git/115acd1529d9529ef5bb095c074ad83d@manjaro.org/

>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/git-format-patch.txt | 6 ++++++
>>   builtin/log.c                      | 8 ++++++--
>>   t/t4014-format-patch.sh            | 9 +++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt 
>> b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
>> index e553810b1e..369af2c4a7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt
>> @@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ RFC means "Request For Comments"; use this when 
>> sending
>>   an experimental patch for discussion rather than application.
>>   "--rfc=WIP" may also be a useful way to indicate that a patch
>>   is not complete yet ("WIP" stands for "Work In Progress").
>> ++
>> +If the convention of the receiving community for a particular extra
>> +string is to have it _after_ the subject prefix, the string _<rfc>_
>> +can be prefixed with a dash ("`-`") to signal that the the rest of
>> +the _<rfc>_ string should be appended to the subject prefix instead,
>> +e.g., `--rfc='-(WIP)'` results in "PATCH (WIP)".
>>     -v <n>::
>>   --reroll-count=<n>::
>> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
>> index 97ca885b33..4750e480e6 100644
>> --- a/builtin/log.c
>> +++ b/builtin/log.c
>> @@ -2065,8 +2065,12 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char 
>> **argv, const char *prefix)
>>   	if (cover_from_description_arg)
>>   		cover_from_description_mode = 
>> parse_cover_from_description(cover_from_description_arg);
>>   -	if (rfc && rfc[0])
>> -		strbuf_insertf(&sprefix, 0, "%s ", rfc);
>> +	if (rfc && rfc[0]) {
>> +		if (rfc[0] == '-')
>> +			strbuf_addf(&sprefix, " %s", rfc + 1);
>> +		else
>> +			strbuf_insertf(&sprefix, 0, "%s ", rfc);
>> +	}
>>     	if (reroll_count) {
>>   		strbuf_addf(&sprefix, " v%s", reroll_count);
>> diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> index 645c4189f9..fcbde15b16 100755
>> --- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> +++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> @@ -1394,6 +1394,15 @@ test_expect_success '--rfc=WIP and --rfc=' '
>>   	test_cmp expect-raw actual
>>   '
>>   +test_expect_success '--rfc=-(WIP) appends' '
>> +	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>> +	Subject: [PATCH (WIP) 1/1] header with . in it
>> +	EOF
>> +	git format-patch -n -1 --stdout --rfc="-(WIP)" >patch &&
>> +	grep "^Subject:" patch >actual &&
>> +	test_cmp expect actual
>> +'
>> +
>>   test_expect_success '--rfc does not overwrite prefix' '
>>   	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>>   	Subject: [RFC PATCH foobar 1/1] header with . in it


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-18 22:54 [PATCH] format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP Junio C Hamano
2024-04-19  0:29 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-19 14:09 ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-19 17:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 14:18     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-19 18:00 ` Jeff King
2024-04-19 18:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-19 22:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 15:41   ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-21 18:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 18:59   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] format-patch --rfc=WIP Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 18:59     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 18:59     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)] Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21 19:37       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-24 10:17         ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-24 15:52           ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-23 17:52     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] format-patch --rfc=WIP Junio C Hamano
2024-04-23 17:52       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 10:16         ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-23 17:52       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)] Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 10:16         ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-24 15:25           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 16:34             ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-24 15:58           ` Dragan Simic [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff5003c369c5247ad1a0b3a51d1581db@manjaro.org \
    --to=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).