From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:05:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed8dc52c-db50-f6fa-9583-8ad4af23d327@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BEtnmzDp0E4=0y9eEMKQ89FcrsK9h-1Mqcd2FDV_EBohw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Elijah
On 17/02/2020 19:12, Elijah Newren wrote:
> I forgot to add some cc's in GitGitGadget before submitting; adding now...
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:15 AM Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>>
>> A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
>> rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
>> then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
>> "Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
>> merge" messages.
>>
>> Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
>> -m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
>> back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
>> interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
>> change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
>> bisect back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking
>> 'git commit', 2017-11-24)
>>
>> After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
>> --exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
>> suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
>> us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
>> digging any further than that.
Intriguing - it's strange that it errors out picking commit2, not
commit1 I'll try and have a look at it. There seem to be some leftover
bits at the start of the test that want removing see below
>> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
>>
>> A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
>> rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
>> then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
>> "Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
>> merge" messages.
>>
>> Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
>> -m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
>> back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
>> interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you change
>> the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will bisect
>> back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git
>> commit', 2017-11-24)
>>
>> After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
>> --exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
>> suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
>> us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
>> digging any further than that.
>>
>> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-712%2Fnewren%2Fdocument-rebase-failure-v1
>> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-712/newren/document-rebase-failure-v1
>> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/712
>>
>> t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh b/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000000..4d2eb1dd7c6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +test_description='git rebase across mode change'
>> +
>> +. ./test-lib.sh
>> +
>> +test_expect_success 'setup' '
>> + rm -rf ../stupid &&
>> + git init ../stupid &&
>> + cd ../stupid &&
I think these 3 lines must be left over from you trying this out before
making it a test
Best Wishes
Phillip
>> + mkdir DS &&
>> + >DS/whatever &&
>> + git add DS &&
>> + git commit -m base &&
>> +
>> + git branch side1 &&
>> + git branch side2 &&
>> +
>> + git checkout side1 &&
>> + git rm -rf DS &&
>> + ln -s unrelated DS &&
>> + git add DS &&
>> + git commit -m side1 &&
>> +
>> + git checkout side2 &&
>> + >unrelated &&
>> + git add unrelated &&
>> + git commit -m commit1 &&
>> +
>> + echo >>unrelated &&
>> + git commit -am commit2
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the apply backend' '
>> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
>> + git checkout -b apply-backend side2 &&
>> + git rebase side1
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_expect_failure 'rebase changes with the merge backend' '
>> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
>> + git checkout -b merge-backend side2 &&
>> + git rebase -m side1
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the merge backend with a delay' '
>> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
>> + git checkout -b merge-delay-backend side2 &&
>> + git rebase -m --exec "sleep 1" side1
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_done
>>
>> base-commit: e68e29171cc2d6968902e0654b5687fbe1ccb903
>> --
>> gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 17:15 [PATCH] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-17 19:12 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-18 15:05 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2020-02-18 15:59 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2020-02-19 16:00 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-19 19:33 ` Phillip Wood
2020-02-18 14:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-02-18 15:55 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-18 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-18 22:01 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-18 22:15 ` [PATCH v3] t3433: " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] merge-recursive: fix the refresh logic in update_file_flags Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-19 19:32 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed8dc52c-db50-f6fa-9583-8ad4af23d327@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).