From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:12:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BEtnmzDp0E4=0y9eEMKQ89FcrsK9h-1Mqcd2FDV_EBohw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.712.git.git.1581959751454.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
I forgot to add some cc's in GitGitGadget before submitting; adding now...
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:15 AM Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>
> A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
> rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
> then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
> "Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
> merge" messages.
>
> Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
> -m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
> back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
> interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
> change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
> bisect back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking
> 'git commit', 2017-11-24)
>
> After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
> --exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
> suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
> us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
> digging any further than that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
>
> A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
> rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
> then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
> "Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
> merge" messages.
>
> Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
> -m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
> back to commit 68aa495b590d (rebase: implement --merge via the
> interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you change
> the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will bisect
> back to 356ee4659bb5 (sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git
> commit', 2017-11-24)
>
> After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
> --exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
> suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
> us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
> digging any further than that.
>
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-712%2Fnewren%2Fdocument-rebase-failure-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-712/newren/document-rebase-failure-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/712
>
> t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
>
> diff --git a/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh b/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000000..4d2eb1dd7c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='git rebase across mode change'
> +
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '
> + rm -rf ../stupid &&
> + git init ../stupid &&
> + cd ../stupid &&
> + mkdir DS &&
> + >DS/whatever &&
> + git add DS &&
> + git commit -m base &&
> +
> + git branch side1 &&
> + git branch side2 &&
> +
> + git checkout side1 &&
> + git rm -rf DS &&
> + ln -s unrelated DS &&
> + git add DS &&
> + git commit -m side1 &&
> +
> + git checkout side2 &&
> + >unrelated &&
> + git add unrelated &&
> + git commit -m commit1 &&
> +
> + echo >>unrelated &&
> + git commit -am commit2
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the apply backend' '
> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
> + git checkout -b apply-backend side2 &&
> + git rebase side1
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_failure 'rebase changes with the merge backend' '
> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
> + git checkout -b merge-backend side2 &&
> + git rebase -m side1
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'rebase changes with the merge backend with a delay' '
> + test_when_finished "git rebase --abort || true" &&
> + git checkout -b merge-delay-backend side2 &&
> + git rebase -m --exec "sleep 1" side1
> +'
> +
> +test_done
>
> base-commit: e68e29171cc2d6968902e0654b5687fbe1ccb903
> --
> gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 17:15 [PATCH] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-17 19:12 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2020-02-18 15:05 ` Phillip Wood
2020-02-18 15:59 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 11:01 ` Phillip Wood
2020-02-19 16:00 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-19 19:33 ` Phillip Wood
2020-02-18 14:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-02-18 15:55 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-18 20:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-18 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-18 22:01 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-18 22:15 ` [PATCH v3] t3433: " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] merge-recursive: fix the refresh logic in update_file_flags Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-19 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-19 19:32 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-19 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABPp-BEtnmzDp0E4=0y9eEMKQ89FcrsK9h-1Mqcd2FDV_EBohw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).