git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Andrey Okoshkin <a.okoshkin@samsung.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	"Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	vmiklos@frugalware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] merge-recursive: check GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY only once
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:13:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecb12f21-f26f-6905-1fdc-60d7c282cfe3@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq37603vek.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

31.10.2017 05:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> That holds true for the code before or after this patch equally.  In
>> other words, that sounds like a justification for rejecting this
>> patch (i.e. explanation of why this change is not needed).
>>
>> If we are worried about another thread calling these functions after
>> the time we call getenv() and before the time we pass the result to
>> strtol(), then I do not think this patch gives a better protection
>> against such race, so I do not think that is why you are doing this.
>>
>> So... why do we want to do this change?  I am puzzled.

I think, the main benefits are:
* Code is more readable, no duplicated calls with the same constant string
argument.
* Code is potentially safer, the second getenv() call may return another
pointer value which could be NULL (and yes, this is an arguable point as it
can be done only artificially).

> For the sake of fairness, I would say that the resulting code may be
> easier to follow and has one less instance of a constant string that
> the compiler cannot statically check if we made a typo.  That's the
> only benefit in this patch as far as I can see.
> 
> The original makes a call to see if the result is NULL, and then
> makes the same call, expecting that we get the same result (not just
> that it is not NULL, but it is the same verbosity request the end
> user made via the environment as the one we checked earlier), and I
> can understand that it feels a bit redundant and ugly.

Yes, you absolutely right.
I believe this patch makes code more beautiful :-)

>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Okoshkin <a.okoshkin@samsung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> Added 'reviewed-by' field.
>>>  merge-recursive.c | 7 ++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
>>> index 1494ffdb8..60084e3a0 100644
>>> --- a/merge-recursive.c
>>> +++ b/merge-recursive.c
>>> @@ -2163,6 +2163,7 @@ static void merge_recursive_config(struct merge_options *o)
>>>  
>>>  void init_merge_options(struct merge_options *o)
>>>  {
>>> +	const char *merge_verbosity;
>>>  	memset(o, 0, sizeof(struct merge_options));
>>>  	o->verbosity = 2;
>>>  	o->buffer_output = 1;
>>> @@ -2171,9 +2172,9 @@ void init_merge_options(struct merge_options *o)
>>>  	o->renormalize = 0;
>>>  	o->detect_rename = 1;
>>>  	merge_recursive_config(o);
>>> -	if (getenv("GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY"))
>>> -		o->verbosity =
>>> -			strtol(getenv("GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY"), NULL, 10);
>>> +	merge_verbosity = getenv("GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY");
>>> +	if (merge_verbosity)
>>> +		o->verbosity = strtol(merge_verbosity, NULL, 10);
>>>  	if (o->verbosity >= 5)
>>>  		o->buffer_output = 0;
>>>  	strbuf_init(&o->obuf, 0);
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Andrey Okoshkin

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20171024152727epcas2p4fb7dcf147e44aadf7733098151d469a5@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2017-10-24 15:27 ` [PATCH] merge-recursive: check GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY only once Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-24 16:28   ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-24 16:45     ` Eric Sunshine
2017-10-24 17:11       ` Martin Ågren
2017-10-24 19:52         ` Jeff King
2017-10-25  1:48           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-25  4:07             ` Eric Sunshine
2017-10-25  7:27               ` Jeff King
2017-10-25 11:39                 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-25 11:53                   ` Eric Sunshine
2017-10-25 12:27                     ` Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-25 13:03                     ` [PATCH v3] " Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-27 17:29                       ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-30  7:42                         ` [PATCH v4] " Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-31  1:42                           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-31  2:26                             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-31  7:13                               ` Andrey Okoshkin [this message]
2017-10-31  7:20                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-31  9:09                                   ` [PATCH v5] " Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-25 11:13           ` [PATCH] " Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-25 10:49       ` Andrey Okoshkin
2017-10-25 10:49     ` Andrey Okoshkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecb12f21-f26f-6905-1fdc-60d7c282cfe3@samsung.com \
    --to=a.okoshkin@samsung.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).