git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:59:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1469483499.git.john@keeping.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4m7d7hlq.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:28:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
> 
> > If there is no upstream information for a branch, it is likely that it
> > is newly created and can safely be pushed under the normal fast-forward
> > rules.  Relax the --force-with-lease check so that we do not reject
> > these branches immediately but rather attempt to push them as new
> > branches, using the null SHA-1 as the expected value.
> >
> > In fact, it is already possible to push new branches using the explicit
> > --force-with-lease=<branch>:<expect> syntax, so all we do here is make
> > this behaviour the default if no explicit "expect" value is specified.
> 
> I like the loss of an extra field from "struct ref".
> 
> I suspect that the if/else cascade in the loop in apply_cas() can
> also be taught that ':' followed by an empty string asks to check
> that the target ref does not exist, in order to make it a bit more
> useful for folks who do not rely on the "use the last observed
> status of the tracking branch".
> 
> That would make the "explicit" test much less cumbersome to read.

Yes, that's nicer and it mirrors the syntax for deleting a remote
branch.

I've pulled it out as a preparatory step because I like the fact that
the "explicit" test passes even before the patch that is the main point
of the series.

> > +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> > +   setup_srcdst_basic &&
> > +   (
> > +           cd dst &&
> > +           git branch branch master &&
> > +           git push --force-with-lease=branch:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 origin branch
> > +   ) &&

John Keeping (3):
  Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting
  push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
  push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease

 Documentation/git-push.txt |  5 +++--
 remote.c                   |  9 +++++----
 remote.h                   |  1 -
 t/t5533-push-cas.sh        | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.2.639.g855ae9f


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-25 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-23 15:31 [PATCH] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-25 21:59   ` John Keeping [this message]
2016-07-25 22:21     ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 20:44     ` [PATCH v3 " John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation John Keeping
2016-07-26 20:44     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 21:59   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation/git-push: fix placeholder formatting John Keeping
2016-07-25 21:59   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation John Keeping
2016-07-25 22:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26  8:03       ` John Keeping
2016-07-26 19:59         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 20:42           ` John Keeping
2016-07-26 21:19             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-26 10:30     ` Jakub Narębski
2016-07-26 11:19       ` John Keeping
2016-07-25 21:59   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-lease John Keeping
2016-07-25 22:11   ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1469483499.git.john@keeping.me.uk \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).